Former Justice Stevens: Remove 2nd Amendment to ‘Improve’ Constitution

By AWR Hawkins

Right To Keep and Bear Arms
Former Justice Stevens: Remove 2nd Amendment to ‘Improve’ Constitution
AmmoLand Gun News
AmmoLand Gun News

Washington DC - -(Ammoland.com)- Former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens has released a new book focused, in part, on “improving” the Constitution through amending the Second Amendment–by making the rights protected therein applicable only to a militia instead of the citizenry at large.

Stevens’ book is titled Six Amendments: How and Why We Should Change the Constitution.

As written, the text of the Second Amendment is: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.”

According to Bloomberg Businessweek, Stevens believes recent court decisions–notably District of Columbia v Heller (2008) and McDonald v Chicago (2010)–placed too much emphasis on individual rights, rather than on what he believes was the Founding Fathers’ primary goal: namely, to answer “the threat that a national standing army posed to the sovereignty of the states.”

His solution is to amend the text of the Second Amendment so that it reads: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms when serving in the militia shall not be infringed.”

In other words, the protection of the right becomes collective and is only protected for those serving in the militia.

Among the many problems with Stevens’ idea is the often overlooked fact that the Second Amendment did not create a right when it was ratified in 1791. Rather, the Founding Fathers created the Second Amendment to protect a portion of the “certain unalienable Rights” with which man was “endowed by [his] Creator.”

The rights protected by the Second Amendment are individual rights, as are the rights that are protected, but not created, by the First, Third, Fourth, and Fifth Amendments, among others.

Follow AWR Hawkins on Twitter @AWRHawkins.

About:
AWR Hawkins writes for all the BIG sites, for Pajamas Media, for RedCounty.com, for Townhall.com and now AmmoLand Shooting Sports News.

His southern drawl is frequently heard discussing his take on current events on radio shows like America’s Morning News, the G. Gordon Liddy Show, the Ken Pittman Show, and the NRA’s Cam & Company, among others. He was a Visiting Fellow at the Russell Kirk Center for Cultural Renewal (summer 2010), and he holds a PhD in military history from Texas Tech University.

If you have questions or comments, email him at awr@awrhawkins.com. You can find him on facebook at www.facebook.com/awr.hawkins.

  • 12 thoughts on “Former Justice Stevens: Remove 2nd Amendment to ‘Improve’ Constitution

    1. What he seems to forget is that in the 1700’s the entire male population between 16 and 60 was the militia (except for half wits and ministers). I guess he would have been among the exempted.

    2. Mr. Stevens you would fit right in with Mr. Putin. You’re such an AHOLE move out to one of the other countries that needs a smart man like yourself.

    3. Yes , so the federal government can more easily enslave all of us freedom lovers that do not want to be enslaved under his NEW COMMUNIST WORLD ORDER like all the other formerly free countries of Canada , Australia , New Zealand , Britain , and etc: etc : etc :

    4. If the Founding Fathers wanted it that way,
      they would have written it as Stevens has.

      The language used in the era, well regulated, has no reference to government control, but in fact ‘in working order’.

      “I say, your timepiece is well regulated”

    5. William H. “Billy the Kid” Bonney became a “regulator” after Lincoln County, New Mexico “Cattle Barons” took his employers ranch by force. Do you see any modern day parallels?

    6. This guy is a National Embarrassment,and just another typical liberal dickweed and no value to America. The rest of the world is laughing at us considering the giant step down. Its time to ignore the buracrats and their garbage.

    7. Justice Stevens’ arguments in his Heller dissent are directly contradicted by the statements of the founders. Numerous such contradictions are documented in posts at On Second Opinion Blog. The first post in the current series showing there is no historical foundation for Stevens’ Heller dissent arguments is entitled Justice Stevens’ Train Wreck of American History.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>