Gilbert, AZ –-(Ammoland.com)- Applying the Second Amendment to knives as arms and the groundbreaking Heller U.S. Supreme Court decision, the Wisconsin Court of Appeals reversed a lower court decision that it was illegal for someone to possess a switchblade (automatic) knife in their home.
The court concluded that the Second Amendment protects knives as well as guns, one of Knife Rights’ foundational principles.
As such, this decision, albeit narrow as was required by Wisconsin law, held that at least with regards to switchblades at home, Wisconsin’s ban is unconstitutional. Knife Rights believes such bans are entirely unconstitutional. Having said that, Knife Rights Wisconsin Knife Law Reform bill, AB 142 would remove this prohibition altogether, as well as enact Knife Law Preemption, resolving the issue entirely. AB 142 has passed the House and awaits a vote in the Senate.
The case arose when Cory Herrmann, the defendant, was injured in his home. Showing his switchblade knife to a friend, Herrmann dropped the knife and cut his femoral artery. After 911 was called, officers responding to the scene seized the switchblade and subsequently Herrmann was charged with illegal possession.
While AB 142 will hopefully settle the issue for good in Wisconsin, this decision is part of an evolving body of law protecting knife ownership and carry that was summarized in the first detailed scholarly analysis of knives and the Second Amendment published in 2013 and authored by noted Second Amendment scholars Dave Kopel, Clayton Cramer and Joe Olson. Read “Knives and the Second Amendment” here: https://www.kniferights.org/Knives-and-the-Second-Amendment.pdf (also below)
Some enlightening quotes from the Court of Appeals decision:
You can read the court’s decision here: https://www.wicourts.gov/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155961
“Although the Heller Court emphasized that handguns are frequently used for self-defense, we do not think Heller can be read to create different levels of protection for different types of arms that fall under the Second Amendment, based on their popularity. In addition, it is not particularly surprising that handguns are more prevalent than switchblades, given that switchblades were banned or severely restricted in many states, including Wisconsin, beginning in the late 1950s and early 1960s.”
A key point is that the court also rejected the state’s intellectually bankrupt argument that only a subset of knives was banned and that alternative knives were available, “Herrmann could have easily used a non- prohibited weapon for his protection. The statutory ban on switchblade knives does not unreasonably impair Herrmann’s right to keep and bear arms.” The Second Amendment, supported by Heller and other decisions, doesn’t differentiate between types of arms. The court held, “The State…failed, to the extent necessary after Heller, to show that Herrmann had reasonable alternative means to exercise his Second Amendment right to bear arms.”
The court also noted some advantages switchblades have over guns;
“For safety reasons people with children may not want guns around the house. People with limited financial resources who may not be able to afford a proper gun likely would be able to afford an effective $10 automatic knife. Finally, for people who are excluded from lawful gun ownership, an automatic knife may be the most effective arm available.”
“The State argues that [the switchblade ban] serves an important governmental objective – namely, protecting the public from the danger of potentially lethal surprise attacks posed by individuals using switchblade knives. However, the State cites no evidence to establish that this danger actually exists to any significant degree. Again, the State has the burden to establish that [the switchblade ban] satisfies intermediate scrutiny, and it must do so by showing the existence of real, not merely conjectural, harm… Thus, on the record before us, we are not convinced that [the switchblade ban] serves an important governmental objective.”
(Initial Draft ) Knives and the Second Amendment by AmmoLand Shooting Sports News
About:
Knife Rights (www.KnifeRights.org) is America’s Grassroots Knife Owners Organization, working towards a Sharper Future for all knife owners. Knife Rights is dedicated to providing knife owners an effective voice in public policy. Become a Knife Rights member and make a contribution to support the fight for your knife rights. Visit www.kniferights.org
Scotland has banned the traditional sword dance by banning swords. Knives are a big problem in Britain.
When I was writing the paper mentioned above, I was startled to find that a lot of knife deaths are suicides.
Legal definition of arms. ARMS. Any thing that a man wears for his defence, or takes in his hands, or uses in his anger, to cast at, or strike at another. Co. Litt. 161 b, 162 a; Crompt. Just. P. 65; Cunn. Dict. h.t. If you can wear it or carry it, it is “arms”. Guns, knives, rifles, shotguns, hatchets. axes, blunt objects (baseball bat, pipes, large wrenches, etc.), and what the ATF considers “Destructive Devices”, i.e., Hand grenades, RPG-7, shoulder rocket launchers, MANPADS, etc. Tanks and howitzers don’t count since you can’t carry one, but you can still own… Read more »
Jeff, As an EMT, I’ve seen just about everything. On a call maybe 25 yrs ago, A guy walking up his basement steps, nudged a wine glass rack. One glass fell, hit the railing and the broken glass, slit his wrist. Slicing through the artery. A freak accident? Absolutely. Keep in mind this. Many archery hunters die from getting impaled by their own arrows. By just falling on them. Like I said, from the things I’ve seen, ANYTHING is possible…Molon Labe
Cut his femoral artery by “dropping the knife? ” Are they serious? ? I call BS on that.
What’s next,..knife violence !