Busting the Lies & Myths of a Trained Armed School Staff
USA –-(Ammoland.com)-There has been more national and local news coverage about arming school staff in the past two weeks than we have ever seen.
Along with that record amount of coverage comes plenty of statements, from people opposed to the idea of armed school staff, that are either untrue or misleading.
Here are the top 8 armed school staff myths:
Myth: We shouldn’t require teachers to carry a gun. Fact: No district is requiring any school staffer to carry a concealed firearm. When a school district decides to authorize staff to carry, they ask for volunteers. And most districts get far more volunteers than they thought they would need.
There is not currently a requirement for anyone to carry, and no one is talking about making it a requirement. It would be an equally ludicrous suggestion to require all citizens to carry a concealed firearm, where concealed carry is legal.
Myth: Teachers don’t want to carry a gun, they want to teach. Fact: Many teachers already carry a concealed firearm in the rest of their lives. Absent being authorized to carry on campus, they must disarm for work.
Myth: We can’t train teachers to be police officers; they don’t have the right mindset. Fact: No one is suggesting they be made into police officers. Authorized school staffers are extremely well trained in stopping an active killer, and stopping the bleeding for those who have been injured. Both of these skillsets will save lives.
When you talk to those school staffers who have been trained and carry on campus today, they are insulted by the suggestion that they don’t have the mindset to stop someone trying to kill their kids.
Myth: Cops won’t know who the bad guy is if teachers also have guns. Fact: A vast majority of these mass casualty events are over before law enforcement arrives. Staffers are trained on how to account for potential confusion in the 911 call, and how to advise law enforcement who the armed defender is. Schools that have armed staff already talk to their local law enforcement to advise them just who on campus is armed.
Myth: Kids will be frightened if they see their teacher with a gun. Fact: Kids don’t see the firearms. Armed school staff carry concealed, and no one is talking about them open carrying. Some school children interviewed actually appreciate armed staff because it makes them feel protected.
Myth: Our school has a School Resource Officer (SRO) or other armed and uniformed security. We are protected and don’t need additional armed staff. Fact: Having armed and uniformed security staff on campus is better than no one being armed. If a campus is large enough for an SRO, it’s a large campus. In the 2013 attack on Arapahoe High School in Centennial, CO, there was an SRO on campus. When he confronted the killer, the coward killed himself. But it was not in time to save Claire Davis. The SRO responded at full speed to the sound of gunfire, but in the 45-seconds it took him to get there, it was too late to save Claire. Had there been an armed staff member closer than 45-seconds away, they just may have been a chance to stop him before he was able to kill her.
In Parkland Florida, there was an SRO on campus and that was neither a deterrent nor a guarantee against the loss of innocent life.
Myth: Based on the low “hit rate” of law enforcement when they fire their service weapon, there is no way an armed teacher can hit the killer. Fact: Most of these killers commit suicide when confronted with an armed defender, without a shot being fired. And in a situation where an armed staff member would have to engage the killer, any chance to stop him is better than no chance to stop him.
In addition, FASTER trained school staff members pass a qualification test that exceeds the test that law enforcement is required to pass in their respective states.
Myth: Schools can’t afford school supplies, how can we expect them to afford guns and training? Fact: Groups like FASTERSavesLives in Ohio and FASTERColorado in Colorado raise private money to help schools afford the very advanced training. Schools spend a lot of money on SROs, video systems, and other school security measures. Training armed school staff is a very small expense in comparison.
Laura Carno
Laura Carno is the Executive Director of FASTERColorado.com, an organization that trains armed first responders in schools to stop the threat and stop the bleeding.
I would gladly pay for a gun and ammo to arm a qualified Teacher or staff member
Bud
7 years ago
Fact: Most career teachers begin to see their students as if they were one of their own. That is the mind set that prompts their defense response when their students are threatened. To question the mind set of some of the most dedicated and well educated people on earth is foolishness. If trained and allowed to be armed they would be a formidable and trustworthy line of defense for your children . I say this as a retired teacher who spent a good portion of my life in the class room.
Herb T
7 years ago
Tell me again what democrats/socialists are proposing/offering to prevent or mitigate criminal shootings. Banning guns will work no better than did prohibition and the war on drugs. Criminals will make lots of money selling banned items and have guns. Law-abiding citizens will not. How much will it cost to require teachers to take first-aid classes from local EMTs?
Paracosm76
7 years ago
We are going to hell for not doing the right thing here. Wehave venerated the gun and valorized its usage. America is violent and the gun is a preferred instrument of that violence. More guns inschools is the dumbest attempt at a solution ever. And you smart ones who are repeating such drivel are an afront to God.
Norm Bristow
7 years ago
If just a half dozen teachers had been armed in Florida, it likely would have reduced the outcome of injury and death. A gun-free zone offers security and confidence to the killer in those first few minutes, with them knowing there is no chance of retaliation. A least there is a fighting chance to those teachers already trapped if they are armed. Just wounding, scaring or injuring the killer would give some precious time to the police. Ideally, they would shoot the killer early in his visit to the school.
realspark21
7 years ago
In addition: Saying that teacher/staff ‘don’t have the mindset’ or ‘don’t have the training’ to protect the students in their care ASSUMES they will also NOT protect themselves (or SHOULD not be allowed to protect themselves). This is the height of conceit…it presumes that the ‘government’ is the only answer…and what is the question? Is it that teachers, staff, and children don’t deserve the same protection afforded to law makers at their place of work? Is is that teachers and staff DESERVE to die, simply for working at a school? Is it that teachers and staff cannot be trusted to… Read more »
I would gladly pay for a gun and ammo to arm a qualified Teacher or staff member
Fact: Most career teachers begin to see their students as if they were one of their own. That is the mind set that prompts their defense response when their students are threatened. To question the mind set of some of the most dedicated and well educated people on earth is foolishness. If trained and allowed to be armed they would be a formidable and trustworthy line of defense for your children . I say this as a retired teacher who spent a good portion of my life in the class room.
Tell me again what democrats/socialists are proposing/offering to prevent or mitigate criminal shootings. Banning guns will work no better than did prohibition and the war on drugs. Criminals will make lots of money selling banned items and have guns. Law-abiding citizens will not. How much will it cost to require teachers to take first-aid classes from local EMTs?
We are going to hell for not doing the right thing here. Wehave venerated the gun and valorized its usage. America is violent and the gun is a preferred instrument of that violence. More guns inschools is the dumbest attempt at a solution ever. And you smart ones who are repeating such drivel are an afront to God.
If just a half dozen teachers had been armed in Florida, it likely would have reduced the outcome of injury and death. A gun-free zone offers security and confidence to the killer in those first few minutes, with them knowing there is no chance of retaliation. A least there is a fighting chance to those teachers already trapped if they are armed. Just wounding, scaring or injuring the killer would give some precious time to the police. Ideally, they would shoot the killer early in his visit to the school.
In addition: Saying that teacher/staff ‘don’t have the mindset’ or ‘don’t have the training’ to protect the students in their care ASSUMES they will also NOT protect themselves (or SHOULD not be allowed to protect themselves). This is the height of conceit…it presumes that the ‘government’ is the only answer…and what is the question? Is it that teachers, staff, and children don’t deserve the same protection afforded to law makers at their place of work? Is is that teachers and staff DESERVE to die, simply for working at a school? Is it that teachers and staff cannot be trusted to… Read more »