Do You Want Nine Justices or Fifteen Hearing Second Amendment Cases?

U.S. Supreme Court Image NRA-ILA
U.S. Supreme Court Image NRA-ILA

Georgia/United States – -(AmmoLand.com)- The Georgia Senate runoff elections that involve Senators Kelly Loeffler and David Perdue come down to one very simple question: Do you want nine justices to hear Second Amendment cases? This is perhaps the fundamental question to ask any Second Amendment supporter who is sitting on the sidelines.

As it stands right, now, the current composition of the Supreme Court makes narrow pro-Second Amendment rulings by six justices very likely. Why? As we discussed earlier, the confirmation of Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court has John Roberts in a bind that is favorable to Second Amendment supporters.

What is that bind? If Roberts votes to uphold things like magazine bans, semi-auto bans, or other anti-Second Amendment laws, and the other five justices appointed by Republican presidents vote to strike them down, then he has no influence. Why? Because by being in the minority, he will not be able to assign the opinion. That duty would then be carried out by the senior associate justice on the Supreme Court.

Right now, the person in that position is none other than Clarence Thomas. It is highly likely that he would, given his past excoriations of the Supreme Court’s refusal to address the Second Amendment, be eager to write the opinion himself (an option that the justice assigning the opinion has). We could expect something sweeping in that instance. To avoid that, Roberts would have to join the other five justices, and he would then be able to assign the opinion to a justice who might make a more narrow ruling.

Of course, this is if the Supreme Court stays at nine members. Remember, during the campaign, Biden and Senate Democrats refused to rule out adding more justices. Unlike President Trump, Biden has not mentioned who he would put on the Supreme Court. In all likelihood, they would be hostile to our rights.

Do you really think that Biden, with his long history of hostility for our rights, would pass up the chance to pack the court to provide a thin veneer of legal justification for whatever attacks he has in mind? Do you trust folks like Jon Tester and Joe Manchin to be the firewall against such schemes?

The fact is, a 50-50 Senate will lead to a packed Supreme Court, which places our rights at extreme risk. Not only do we risk losing our Second Amendment rights, but we could also easily see our First Amendment rights abridged as well… with the system rigged against us for the foreseeable future. Second Amendment supporters need to back the re-election efforts of Senators Loeffler and Perdue, then also support the National Rifle Association’s Political Victory Fund and their Institute for Legislative Action, in order to be ready for 2022 and 2024.


About Harold Hutchison

Writer Harold Hutchison has more than a dozen years of experience covering military affairs, international events, U.S. politics and Second Amendment issues. Harold was consulting senior editor at Soldier of Fortune magazine and is the author of the novel Strike Group Reagan. He has also written for the Daily Caller, National Review, Patriot Post, Strategypage.com, and other national websites.

Harold Hutchison

23 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
JNew

Progressive liberals: change the rules, win the game.

Core

Sorry Democrats you do not get to change the rules every election you pithy tyrants. The truth is the SCOTUS is unable to handle the volume of Article VI violations at State levels due to abuses by Democrat leadership. SCOTUS needs more resources to take on more unconstitutional cases.

Last edited 4 years ago by Core
Ram

A packed court will give the Democrats what they’ve always wanted.
SCOTUS set on a perpetual Marxist default, so they can legislate
from the bench. They would be impervious to any efforts to revive
our nation’s heritage.

KDude

Thus far in our Republic’s history, so many courts and judges have had so much trouble understanding what the average eighth grader can read and assimilate : “the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed”. I doubt adding more judges to SCOTUS is gonna make much difference one way or the other. Any old way, this is the law I live by, and will be upheld on pain of death for any public servant attempting to break it and illegally try to rob me of property and liberty. Hope that’s clear. All the rest… Read more »

Z

People will March right up Pennsylvania Ave with firearms in tow….DC Police don’t have enough man power to stop a million plus gun owners…!!!!

tetejaun

The question is moot: Biden, by massive voter fraud, has won the election. At every stage of investigation, democrat ‘judges’ are crapping on the law, as is Barr and the FBI. Massive amounts of money talk loudly. Zuckie, the communist Chinese and Soros have been busy buying politicians and ‘judges’. Americans, unlike ANY other people on Earth, have the absolute Right & Duty to arrest criminals, protect (by any means) the Constitution and rout voter fraud utilizing their Second Amendment Rights. BUT…cowardice has Americans by the balls and their FEAR of losing ANYTHING, losing any of their ‘stuff’, is a… Read more »