HOUSTON, TX–-(Ammoland.com)- The group that kicked off the 3D printing of firearms has preemptively struck back against any new regulations by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF), banning the sale of “80%” receivers.
Defense Distributed launched their new 0% receivers a week before Shot Show. The code for the 0% receivers will be available for the Ghost Gunner 3 without the need for expensive upgrades.
“The ATF unfinished receiver rule is irrelevant before even being published,” Cody Wilson told AmmoLand News.
Defense Distributed is the brainchild of crypto-anarchist Cody Wilson. Mr. Wilson rose to fame for printing one of the first, if not the first, 3D-printed gun known as the “Liberator.” The Liberator was a 3D-printed pistol that fired a .380 ACP round. It was named after the World War II-era pistol that the allies dropped over occupied France. He gained the moniker of “the most dangerous man in the world” for his pushing the boundaries of 3D printing.
Defense Distributed launched the Ghost Gunner as a way of defeating gun control. The Ghost Gunner is a home three-axis CNC capable of milling out an 80% AR-15 lower. The first machine took the user several hours to finish an AR-15 lower. The later version could complete the milling process in as little as 30 minutes. The latter machines could also finish Polymer80 Glock-based frames and 1911 frames.
Defense Distributed and Ghost Gunner have been the targets of anti-gun groups that disagree with the company’s stance on liberty. Some states like New Jersey and California have attacked the group. The State Department also tried to block Defense Distributed from sharing its files online, claiming the group violated the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) by allowing people to download files from their website.
With new regulations coming down from the ATF soon surrounding unfinished frames and receivers, the company decided to demonstrate that you “can’t stop the signal” by releasing the “Defense Distributed 0% receiver.” The receiver will not be made up of a single part. It will consist of three sections.
Defense Distributed Zero Percent (0% ) Gun Receiver
The current Ghost Gunner 3 is capable of taking a solid block of aluminum and milling out a receiver. There are no specialty tools needed to complete the process. The end-user will need to use a new fixture and three new bits. These new bits can be purchased at any hardware store or from Amazon.
This first section is the buffer ring bolt-on. This part consists of where the end-user would attach a buffer tube to the receiver. The item will be available on Ghost Gunner’s website for an estimated price of about $85.
A bottom part is called the “grip face.” It consists of part of the mag well, the trigger section, and the grip itself. This part will be included in the buffer ring package. The solid piece of aluminum will cost around $20, making the entire build cost on average $105, which is comparable to 80% receivers currently on the market.
The whole process only has seven operations that anyone can do with little to no skill. The total cutting time is around three hours. There is no need to add water cooling, but a spindle fan is needed, which worried me when I first learned of the 0% existence.
The Ghost Gunner will be at SHOT Show along with the 0% receiver.
With the launch of the Defense Distributed Zero Percent Gun Receivers, it seems destined that ATF and the anti-gun haters will have to ban raw blocks of Aluminium next.
About John Crump
John is a NRA instructor and a constitutional activist. John has written about firearms, interviewed people of all walks of life, and on the Constitution. John lives in Northern Virginia with his wife and sons and can be followed on Twitter at @crumpyss, or at www.crumpy.com.
This is both the right way and also a bad idea for any individual company. The side plate of m1919 are labeled receiver. Could you sell a side plate if it was cut in half and connected with roll pins? Would it no longer be a full receiver then? People can sell cut up receivers from part kits without needing an FFL. So take all that into account. 1: This is like cutting up an ar15 receiver into a part kit. 2: They have made it so one portion of the gun is the receiver that needs FFL and serial… Read more »
One fine example of how well serialising firearms works for “getting the bad guys”. Some clowns staged a breakin at a gun shop in Indiana a fwe years back. The deale,r of course, by checking what remained and his inventiry, know the SN’s of everything stolen, make model ,etc. A year or so later one of the guns was used in a murder in Chicago (he murder capitol of the Fee World). They did not know it at the time that it was one of those stolen. Over the next three and a half years, that same gun was poistively… Read more »
it seems destined that ATF and the anti-gun haters will have to ban raw blocks of Aluminium next.
Well then, when the clown show drives up in that car, simply contact yur local non-ferrous metal distributor and start buying 10 foot sections of bar stock of a suitable alloy. Will BATF come after yuo for that? Perhaps make a couppe of non-gun parts for somethingelse and have a couplelying about for whenthey do show up at your door (warrant in hand, of course…..) WHenthey see whatyou have made out of that ten foot section, what can they do next?
The pistol vs AR-pattern rifle is self evident: Not addressing crimes committed with pistols, and using the number of injuries and deaths to launch into the banning of semiauto rifles that have little to do with crime proves this whole debate has NOTHING to do with crimes. What it DOES have to do with is that AR-pattern rifles are the perfect tool for We The People to resist tyranny from an out-of-control regime. Wars for independence or liberation require rifles and ‘boots on the ground’… Therefore, the tyrants are focusing on rifles instead of pistols, because their endgame is total… Read more »
So, let me get this straight. The machine costs $2,500, the “0% starter” is $85, the block of aluminum is $25 and, the software is $11. So, the first receiver would cost $2,621 AND, it’s a Frankenstien two piece lower? Then, each additional two piece lower receiver would cost $110? I think I’ll pass. If it comes to that, we’ll probably be neck deep in a revolution already and, all bets will be off. Either way, this is not a cost effective way to get an AR-15.
Real Historical origins of AFT (from wiki) =The ATF was formerly part of the United States Department of the Treasury, having been formed in 1886 as the “Revenue Laboratory” within the Treasury Department’s Bureau of Internal Revenue. The history of ATF can be subsequently traced to the time of the revenuers or “revenoors”[4] and the Bureau of Prohibition, which was formed as a unit of the Bureau of Internal Revenue in 1920. It was made an independent agency within the Treasury Department in 1927, was transferred to the Justice Department in 1930, and became, briefly, a division of the FBI in 1933. When the Volstead Act, which… Read more »