Ordinary Men Will Save Our 2nd Amendment

Ordinary Men Will Save Our 2nd Amendment

U.S.A. — The 2nd Amendment is one of the most important barriers to tyranny. Our Founders knew that he who has the guns, has the power. The fight for those guns, between those who want control and those who want to preserve freedom, has become especially fierce in recent decades. The enemies of freedom have become much craftier and have been able to use the legal system to their advantage in many cases. However, every once in a while, ordinary men do extraordinary things and often don’t realize the impact on future generations they will have.

In the Bruen case out of New York State, an extraordinary new precedent was created when Justice Clarence Thomas declared gun laws must meet “historical tradition.” Did he know the impact he would have? Did he know that he would be giving the 2nd Amendment new life?

Let’s go back a bit further to two men named Brandon Koch and Robert Nash. Koch and Nash were denied their concealed carry permit in the State of New York because they did not show “proper cause” according to the State. The State of New York had decided, despite the 2nd Amendment, that they would be the authority to which New York residence would plead their case and request permission to carry a gun outside their home. The anti-gun group The Giffords Law Center agreed that licenses are only granted to individuals who show “proper cause,” which means applicants must “demonstrate a special need for self-defense.” The irony of course would be in whom would determine the parameters of “special need” and “proper clause.”

You’ve heard the anti-gun crowd use terms like, “nobody needs to carry a gun in public,” or “nobody needs an AR 15,” or “Nobody needs ten rounds to kill a deer.” The word “need’ is used to get people comfortable with the idea that rights are not actually rights but government issued privileges measured by a metric of need that Democrat legislatures will determine. The New York legislature literally wrote “need” into law when they implemented the “proper cause” requirement. New York Citizens would now be required to demonstrate a compelling “need” prior to being allowed the “privilege” of exercising a “right.” God granted the right to self-defense, New York Democrats believed they can take it away.

Brandon Koch and Robert Nash had a different understanding of rights and privileges and proceeded to take on the fight of their lives. In the process, reminding all those who were watching why it is important for ordinary men to stand up in the face of tyranny. With help from the New York State Rifle and Pistol Association, the nearly 8-year process to shut down the State’s overreach had begun.

Koch and Nash won against the State in a case called New York State Rifle and Pistol Association, Inc. v Bruen. In his written decision, Justice Clarence Thomas made it clear that gun laws must meet “historical tradition.” These two words would give the 2nd Amendment new life moving forward by creating a precedent that would call into question the vast majority of gun laws in America.

Not to be outdone, the originally appointed Governor Kathy Hochul and her Democrat-dominant legislature in New York had a new law implemented immediately after the Bruen decision came down. It would seem they knew they would lose and had prepared a new package of even more heinous, constitution-violating gun laws called “The Concealed Carry Improvement Act.” In it, “Proper cause” was traded for new terms such as “good moral character” and “sensitive locations,” which would be used to illegally control the bearing of arms regardless of the fact that the supreme court had recently determined New York’s gun laws a violation of Citizens rights.

Today, although several components of the new CCIA have been deemed unconstitutional by state Supreme Courts, Kathy Hochul and District Attorney Letitia James are relying heavily on their ability to hold up those judges’ decisions through the appeals process.

Although State legislatures across the Country are implementing more gun laws in what seems to be nothing more than angry, defiant behavior, “historical tradition” is being used as a way to knock them back. Recently, semi-auto rifle bans in Illinois and Washington State have been implemented and are quickly being challenged, with a temporary injunction recently won in Illinois.

Can we expect a flurry of court cases as we move forward? Probably. Have Koch and Nash angered the tyrannical states? Maybe, but it would seem they have also strengthened the 2nd Amendment By encouraging Justice Clarence Thomas to clarify the requirement of gun legislation to reflect our nation’s historical tradition.

Ordinary men wrote the 2nd Amendment, and it would seem, ordinary men are defending it.


About Dan Wos, Author – Good Gun Bad Guy

Dan Wos is available for Press Commentary. For more information contact PR HERE

Dan Wos is a nationally recognized 2nd Amendment advocate, Host of The Loaded Mic and Author of the “GOOD GUN BAD GUY” book series. He speaks at events, is a contributing writer for many publications, and can be found on radio stations across the country. Dan has been a guest on Newsmax, the Sean Hannity Show, Real America’s Voice, and several others. Speaking on behalf of gun-rights, Dan exposes the strategies of the anti-gun crowd and explains their mission to disarm law-abiding American gun-owners.

Dan Wos
Dan Wos
18 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
swmft

it is getting close to the time when we will have to stand and reclaim our country from a bunch of criminals , and there are some that should be killed out of hand for their treason

Darkman

Looooong Past.

Henry Bowman

Nice sentiment, but this should’ve happened already.

DIYinSTL

Thanks, Henry. Made me laugh.

GomeznSA

Henry – gotta paraphrase George’s comment – the Founders would be DONE stacking bodies by now…………………
NOTE – this is not to be construed as any sort of threat, merely an observation.

warfinge

Those of us that agree are likely too old to run to the mailbox, let alone confront the forces these criminals have surrounded themselves with. Younger folks are encumbered by the comfort of their lives and won’t see the problem with the same urgency until it’s too late. A rebellion from scratch with a scarcity of firearms and ammunition will be much more difficult. Of course Mexico will will provide whatever we need on the black market. Guns and ammo would be a new revenue stream for the Cartels. The future is bleak I fear.

HLB

I don’t know if this png image will size correctly here.

HLB

Darkman

The government believes their are only 400 million firearms in private hands. As well as over a Trillion rounds of ammo. Even with only those numbers. The current military couldn’t stop a rebellion of determined people. Simply because the government couldn’t stand against the collateral damage. Such a rebellion would require to stop. Which is also why our military hasn’t won a conflict since WWII.

DDS

That assumes that the military would retain cohesion and not divide into those who supported the government, those who supported the rebels, and those who decided to sit it out on the sidelines. You shouldn’t need much convincing that such a scenario would happen. We’ve had two major insurrections so far. One in 1775 through 1781. And another from 1861 through 1865. In the first instance, colonists who had served under British officers in the French and Indian war split, some supporting the rebellion, some supporting the British. In the second instance, thousands of men left their units, those from… Read more »

Boom

You’re not gonna stand a chance. It would be utter chaos. There will be no power, no water, no sewage control, no cell phone, no pharma, no fuel trucks coming in… No grocery restocks…you thought the chinaVirus was bad? Here’s a fun fact…. One Scout platoon (six GunTrucks -or- Tracks) can set a screen 22 clicks wide. (Semi-open terrain) A Scout Troops’ mortar section can easily reach out five clicks, with steel on steel precision. Have you ever seen what I TOW missle can do to a main battle tank, much less as suburban? Don’t bother downvoting, don’t bother even… Read more »

Last edited 1 year ago by Boom
CaptainKerosene

Back in 1970 I got a U.S. CONSTITUTION booklet from USGPO. Looking at the Second Amendment I noticed there were 3 commas. My 1947 and 1955 encyclopedias hard only one comma.. I wrote Congressman Paul Findley asking what was correct.
A few months later I got a letter from the congressman with a longer attachment from the CONGRESSONAL REDEARCH SERVICE. ONE COMMA JS HOW IT WAS PASSED AND RATIFIED.
With the two extra commas it can be read as the militia shall not be infringed.

Darkman

It was ordinary Men and, yes some Women who fought and died for, and each following generation to enjoy, fight for, and defend. Is it not Our time to do likewise. Or are we the last generation? That had the choice, and chose not to do so. What have we left for our children to do?

Darkman

I see the cowards or worse, whiny azz liberal/progressives among us are hitting the down button. Without the courage to speak up for what they believe.

Dubi Loo

Lawfare being perpetrated on We The People.

BigRed

The only thing those two words gave life to is endless litigation that will keep our rights in limbo another 10 years and cost zillions of dollars. If they were standing up for the second amendment they would have written a cease and desist order to every government entity in the country that was infringing on the blatant and very easy to understand text. They would have stationed national guard around the country to ensure that these government entities got the picture they weren’t messing around. They would have cut it all off with one pass. They didn’t, instead they… Read more »

Arny

I got to agree with ya BR. When has the legal system ever been the answer for the people ?

Knute Knute

From 1789 to 1814? From the time the Constitution was ratified, until it was co-opted by the unlawful destruction of the 13th Amendment?

Boz

It’s NOT the Bill-of-Needs…….it’s the Bill-of-RIGHTS!