Is New Mexico Governor Grisham Deliberately Inciting Open Rebellion?

Opinion

  • Firearm Rights Suspension: Backed by George Soros, Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham suspended public firearm rights in Albuquerque for 30 days, sparking constitutional concerns.
  • Hidden Soros Agenda: Governor Grisham and other Governors might covertly advance a Marxist agenda to dismantle Americans’ gun rights.
  • Avoiding Real Issues: Grisham is accused of shifting blame from violent crime and police issues to law-abiding citizens’ gun ownership, questioning her true intentions.
Protest Uprising People Marching Hooded Man Protesting Fist Activism Equal Human Rights Gun Violence iStock-Tero Vesalainen-1124732879.jpg
iStock-Tero Vesalainen

Soros-backed high-ranking State, County, and Municipal officials do not initiate unconscionable, unconstitutional actions out of the blue. And that is no less true of New Mexico’s present Governor, Michelle Lujan Grisham.

This pretentious, sanctimonious political leader of New Mexico is a Soros-backed toady.

As the New York Post reported on September 9, 2023,

“New Mexico Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham, whose campaign was backed by left-wing billionaire George Soros, riled up conservatives and gun owners after she issued an emergency order suspending the right to carry firearms in public in Albuquerque and the surrounding county for at least 30 days.”

See also the news accounts from local New Mexico newspapers, the Pinon Post, and “Santa Fe New Mexican,” and the article posted by the Republican Governor’s Association (RGA).

Do Americans honestly believe that Michelle Lujan Grisham’s unconscionable, unconstitutional actions, suspending the exercise of the fundamental, natural law right of armed self-defense in numerous jurisdictions across New Mexico, springs from a true public safety concern and that the Public Health Order is really just temporary?

Are Americans that naïve?

Governor Michelle Grisham in New Mexico, along with Governors Kathy Hochul in New York & Gavin Newsome in California, & several other Governors across the landscape of America, are “moles.”

They are waiting to spring into action when called upon by their secretive “Case Officers,” aka Contributors, to do so, and with the U.S. Supreme Court rulings, they have begun to spring into action—some earlier, some later.

But they are all intent on assuaging the concerns of their Marxist benefactors and fully adhering to the Marxist agenda.

Governors invoke different strategies, as required, given the nuances of each State, but all are directed to the same outcome: destruction of the right of the people to keep and bear arms.

And, for those Americans who think their State is immune from the coming Soros-initiated and inspired Marxist conflagration, think again.

States like New Mexico, Arizona, and Colorado were once reliably “Red States.” That was true once, but no longer. Soros and other powerful Marxists and their organizations have seen to that. And these insolent, arrogant characters intend “to turn” many other “Red States,” “Blue.”

Grisham’s Strategy For Defeating The Right Of Americans To Keep And Bear Arms In New Mexico.

While the news media has focused attention on the bizarre and dangerous gambit of the Governor, little to no attention is focused on why this is. What brought this on?

What motivated this Soros-flunky to act in the bold and brazen way she did?

Grisham would like the public to believe her actions stem from what she, along with sympathetic voices in the Press, referred to as an “epidemic of gun violence” rampaging across the State.

But, if this is true, it can only mean that a wave of criminal violence besets New Mexico. And that is true enough. But, given that fact, why issue an emergency Public Health Order targeting innocent citizens residing in New Mexico?

Why not mobilize the police across the State and root out criminal violence, or, if need be, call out the State militia to deal head-on and strenuously with crime and criminals and lunatics rampaging through the State?

If the extent and intensity of violent crime caused by a myriad of psychopaths and drug cartels wielding guns across New Mexico is that great, then zero in on that issue and leave average, law-abiding, rational, responsible American gun owners who reside in New Mexico alone.

But Grisham won’t do that. She won’t do that because it is these average Americans in New Mexico that she wishes to target, hundreds of thousands of them.

What is going on here?

The answer or a major part of the answer is found in a story we uncovered (of all places) on the leftist website NPR.

Note: the April 14, 2023 article mentions Albuquerque and it is Albuquerque that bears the brunt of the impact of Grisham’s September 2023 “Public Health Order.” Is this just coincidence? We don’t think so.

The NPR article proceeds with this:

“Home to about 2.1 million people, New Mexico has one of the highest rates of police killings per capita in the country.

Last year, 32 people — around 15 people per million — were killed by police in the state, . . . .

New Mexico is second to Wyoming, with a population of about 581,000, where around 17 people per million were killed by police. . . .

‘We know that commonsense policies like requiring de-escalation and a high standard for when to use force keep all of us safer,’ Jones said.

Gun Ownership And Culture Play A Factor

As of 2021, there were 122,968 federally registered firearms in the state, according to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. The data is collected under the National Firearms Act, but this reflects only a subsection of weapons.

Using data from the Rand Corp., CBS News reported that roughly 46% of adults in New Mexico had at least one gun at home in 2021. The state ranked 21st in a list of states and gun ownership. Texas, with more than 1 million gun licenses and roughly 46% of adults reporting they live in a home with guns, ranked first.

Most of New Mexico ‘is rural, people rely on self-protection’, and there’s more of a culture of hunting compared to the rest of the country, so high gun ownership makes sense, said Maryam Ahranjani, a law professor at the University of New Mexico. . . .

For many years, the Albuquerque Police Department, the law enforcement agency in the state’s largest city, has had difficulties with its officers’ use-of-force. . . .

A review of Albuquerque Police Department shootings between 2018 and 2022 showed that deadly force was used when attempting to apprehend violent suspects, when citizens were experiencing a mental health episode, or when people were acting badly while under the influence of drugs or alcohol, the city’s police chief said in November.”

The NPR article suggests the problem in New Mexico is two-fold: Inadequate police training (which may or may not be true), and New Mexico’s high rate of violent crime, which is true and very well-documented.

Assuming for purposes of argument that NPR is correct and a problem does exist with too many “trigger-happy police officers” in New Mexico, and especially in Albuquerque, then the Governor should do something concrete about improving police training.

And since New Mexico is the second most crime-ridden State in the Country, which FBI Statistics do bear out, the Governor should crack down on incidents of violent crime. See the articles in the Pinon Post and in “Inside Sources.

Responding strenuously to the latter (raging violent crime) would resolve any perceived problem with the former (shootings by police done in defense of their own life and well-being and that of innocent others when apprehending dangerous psychopaths and criminal lunatics).

But Grisham is doing nothing to deal effectively and strenuously with either. And neither goal is achieved. Neither goal can be achieved. Neither goal is meant to be achieved.

Instead of dealing with crime, Grisham pretends the problem rests with “guns.”

And, since most of those guns fall within the control of the non-violent, ordinary citizen, she ignores the crime and targets the citizen. But that was her desire all along. For, it isn’t the violent crime that concerns her. It is and always was “the armed citizen” that troubles both her and the other Marxist Governors.

Getting rid of guns in the hands of tens of millions of average, responsible, rational, law-abiding citizens serves to avoid the real problem any Tyrant faces—the armed citizenry. For, the exercise of the natural law right to armed self-defense serves as the ultimate effective deterrent to a Ravaging Tyrant.

So, of course, Grisham’s illegal Public Health Order exempts police from carrying firearms in public, and of course, there is nothing in the Order that so much as suggests an attempt to tackle violent crime.

Such crime is, therefore, permitted to go unchecked and, in fact, to flourish in New Mexico.

After releasing her “Public Health Order,” Michelle Lujan Grisham smugly and disingenuously asserted, as reported by The New York Times in an article published on September 9, 2023, that NM wholeheartedly approves of Grisham’s actions,

“‘I welcome the debate and the fight about making New Mexicans safer’. . . . ‘We’ll make adjustments, and I intend to make Albuquerque the safest place in America, . . . . ‘It’s a tall order, and I am on it.’”

Governor Grisham is on nothing but her high horse. And, if it is a debate that the Governor truly wants, then fine, let’s have at it.

But let the public, the State Legislature, and the Governor’s Office debate “making New Mexico safer” before, not after, executing an order that merely presumes what must be proved and that would inevitably be proved false, even nonsensical——namely that guns in the hands of average, responsible, rational, law-abiding American citizens living in New Mexico are the root cause of both New Mexico’s rampaging criminal violence and New Mexico’s “trigger-happy cops.”

Is this Soros-backed Marxist Governor defiantly, ardently daring the armed citizenry to respond to her shameless, brash Order through open armed revolt? It sure looks like it.

If so, she will come to rue what she has so cavalierly initiated and incited.


About The Arbalest Quarrel:

Arbalest Group created `The Arbalest Quarrel’ website for a special purpose. That purpose is to educate the American public about recent Federal and State firearms control legislation. No other website, to our knowledge, provides as deep an analysis or as thorough an analysis. Arbalest Group offers this information free.

For more information, visit: www.arbalestquarrel.com.

Arbalest Quarrel

33 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Knute Knute

I put this down to another of the progs “trial balloons”. They’ve been doing this all my life. They take ridiculous ‘legal’ actions, and then watch the reaction. Then they decide wether the balloon they tried to float will fly or not. Most of the time it won’t, and they retreat… but they never stop trying. Not for as long as I’ve been alive, anyway. They’ve been doing this since well before my time. Lexington and Concord happened bc of a British trial balloon, to see what would happen if they tried to enforce a ban on firearms. It ended… Read more »

nrringlee

Correct. They will see if they can jam this trial balloon through Overton’s Window in NM and before hotel 2024 election will try it nation wide. Justification will be some brand of South Asian Bat Guano Virus variant 24. Fear is the left’s only real tool to convince.

PMinFl

RE last sentence: and so many fall for it.

totbs

Now she’s rescinded her decree on firearms carry ban because of near universal blowback, and has modified it to bans on firearms in school zones and public places such as public parks. Lawsuits against her need to go forward, as does impeachment.

Ledesma

They certainly don’t want open rebellion. Millions of riflemen might over-react. And start hunting liberals.

nrringlee

Progressives.

Knute Knute

In my day we called them the “antis”. Those that are anti-everything, esp. personal liberty. Now that they have a new name, the progs, I say they’re finally for something alright. They’re for “progressing” all the way back to the Dark Ages! 🙂
OFC, that’s not progression, it’s regresion, the polar opposite. But it’s fitting, since they’ve long been ass-backward!

PMinFl

no, we have brtter morals.

Montana454Casull

I bet the bitch has armed security, take thier guns first and them let’s see of she shows her face in public running her ignorant mouth.

grant

“Is New Mexico Governor Grisham Deliberately Inciting Open Rebellion?”
Absolutely, Just Like Joe Biden keeps “poking the Bear’ until it bites,
Then he can bring in his F-15’s and really start quelling any Dissent.

Bigfootbob

Seems like they’re squashing people now. Picking off one here, one there and another one tomorrow. That’s how they are going to do it.

Until conservatives start protecting the ballot box in their hometowns and encourage people to vote intelligently rather than emotionally expect to see more of the guerrilla and lawfare skirmishes until one side gets the upper hand.

Knute Knute

Like in the “Battle of Athens”(TN), in 1946!
https://www.americanheritage.com/battle-athens

totbs

I read about this years ago. It was good to re-read it. It appears the more things change, the more things stay the same. The “free press” is still allied with the same gang of thugs, and the democrat machine is still stuffing the ballot box.

Knute Knute

S.S.D.D. Same S**t, Different Day! 🙂

Roland T. Gunner

It would tickle me pink to actually provoke that level of violent response from that corrupt, demented, doddering asshole.

Darkman

Since the Courts have ruled against her. There is nothing to rebel against. Thus there is no rebellion.

Darkman

Now she is trying to save face by pretending to do something that is already against the law.
BREAKING: New Mexico Governor ‘Amends’ Her Order, Lifts Ban On Open & Concealed Carry [VIDEO] – The Truth About Guns
https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/breaking-new-mexico-governor-amends-her-order-allows-open-concealed-carry/

Monkey Mouse

Police know they have zero chance against a numerically superior force intent on ending someone under their protection. They should have given her up to show the other governors what will happen if they “get stupid”. Maybe next time.

Boz

The court only “ruled against her” temporarily. We need a permanent ruling against her.

totbs

Except that she didn’t just drop it. She’s now modified her unilateral ban.

nrringlee

Excellent work. I am going to send this article to the folks who are taking my Constitution Alive class this fall and share with them this particular picture of government sponsored violence against citizens. Of note, though, is the disproportionately high influence of drugs in NM on criminal activity. Since the days when the Red Diaper Doper Babies landed with trust funds in hand the once peaceful state of New Mexico has suffered from the infusion of hard drugs and the consequences thereof. Cartels today make Breaking Bad look like a ’50’s soap opera. The influence of cocaine, crack, meth… Read more »

Knute Knute

In that class, I hope you won’t forget to at least mention Article 4, Section 4:
“The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government…”
Newbies might also benefit from learning that “republican” is also a form of government(and that we are NOT, by law, a democracy. Democracy is mob rule, not rule of law) and not just a political party.

Cappy

Was she inciting open rebellion? She’s a stupid democrat (but, I repeat myself) and would have stuck with her decision to make all guns illegal EXCEPT that the police and sheriffs would not back her play. If she had commie law enforcement, New Mexico would have had a true blood bath.

Knute Knute

Nice homage to Sam Clemens there, Cappy!
“Reader, suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself.” ― Mark Twain

63Sunset

The NPR article found at least 3 ways to imply police need training because they don’t know any other way to deal with armed citizens, good guy or bad guy except to shoot them. The Arbalest Quarrel article implies Grisham issued the orders because shes’ auditioning for more Soros’ cash. The police being at the wrong address and killing an unsuspecting citizen is a common occurrence these days. Perhaps the police and dispatchers can get some training on that too or we’ll have to adopt a belief that the police will kill you if you open your door holding anything… Read more »

doug

She wants to cause another Jan 6

Knute Knute

Probably bc the first one isn’t working out as well as they expected.

Matt in Oklahoma

Thing about goading others into deadly conflict is you yourself can become the target. It’s a slippery slope and if it happens no one will remember you within years in our current society so no martyrdom. Don’t believe me? Quickly name the 9-11 attackers.

Tactiham

Abu Durka, Haji Durka, Muji Durka, Mohammed Durka, Durka Durka. Did I get any of those right?

Boom

Hahahahahahaha

Roland T. Gunner

Yeah, I got a real yuck yuck outta that too lol.

Roland T. Gunner

I seriously doubt NM has any worse problem with “trigger happy police than any other state; or that Albuquerque has a worse problem than any other medium sized city in the US.

And, assuming the given statistics are reasonably accurate, and NM is both primarily rural and the second worst state for violent crime, I have to ask: how does this crime problem manifest itself?

Rural farmhouse home invasions, by criminal gangs roaming the rural counttyside like some dystopian, post-apocalyptic sci-fi movie?

Roland T. Gunner

Pet peeve.