For years, people have been purchasing solvent traps and following Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) procedures to legally convert the devices into suppressors by filling out an ATF Form 1, paying for a $200 tax stamp, and going through all the checks and balances. The ATF has recently started rejecting all applications to make a suppressor. In a letter written to federal firearms licensees (FFLs) on November 20, the Bureau claims that solvent traps never existed under federal law and most have always been unregistered silencers.
Solvent traps are devices used to catch fluids from cleaning firearms. The device attaches to the barrel of a gun. These traps can be purchased from various retailers, notably Chinese websites like Aliexpress and Wish. Many Americans purchased these items to legally convert solvent traps into suppressors, but the ATF claims the term does not exist in its regulations.
“’Solvent traps’ are marketed as devices that attach to firearm barrels to catch excess solvent used when cleaning firearms,” the letter reads. “ATF has not classified any device as a ‘solvent trap,’ because that term does not exist in the relevant Federal statutes or implementing regulations.”
The ATF asserts that “some” devices marketed as solvent traps are suppressors because they have objective design features and characteristics that can be used to cut down on the decibels a firearm produces. The Bureau also looks at the individual parts to determine if a solvent trap crosses the line of being a silencer.
One example the ATF gives is if there is an indentation that can be used as a drill guide. The agency states that these index markings have no purpose other than showing users where to drill to convert a solvent trap into a suppressor. This reasoning is similar to the ATF stating that an AR-15 with an index mark for the third hole is considered a machinegun. The ATF says that the solvent trap might still be a silencer even without indexing.
Other features that the ATF says make a solvent trap a suppressor are baffles, spacers, ported inner sleeve or tube, expansion chamber, end caps, and dampening material. In the eyes of the ATF, any of these could turn a law-abiding citizen into a felon facing ten years in prison and a $250,000 fine. This penalty is the same as being caught with an unregistered machinegun.
“Other such characteristics may include baffles, spacers, ported inner sleeve or tube, expansion chamber, end caps, and dampening material, depending on the particular design of the device,” the ATF says. “While increasing the effectiveness of a firearm silencer, these same objective design features offer no advantages in collecting or filtering cleaning solvent.”
The ATF says that end caps by themselves are suppressors, even if an end cap is the only part an end-user has. The ATF clearly believes that a silencer does not have to be complete or functional before the owner crosses the line. Just the mere possession of a single part can send a person to prison if the ATF decides to prosecute.
The ATF also claims that users with solvent traps can not legally convert them into suppressors even if they complete the proper paperwork. Its reasoning is the originating company already created an unregistered suppressor and didn’t go through the appropriate steps to transfer it. Once those steps are skipped, they can never be made legal in the eyes of the ATF.
“Over the years, many companies involved in marketing such ’solvent traps’ have asserted that they are permitted to manufacture, transfer, or import these items because they are not yet ‘complete’ and therefore do not qualify as ‘firearm silencers’ under Federal law,” the ATF writes. “However, this assertion is incorrect because a component of a ‘firearm silencer’ need not be fully functional before it is recognized as a ‘part intended only for use’ in assembling or fabricating a ‘firearm silencer.’”
Another issue facing solvent trap owners is that most items are imported from China. According to the ATF, a suppressor can not be imported, although a few exceptions exist. None of those exceptions apply to the civilian populations.
“Both the GCA, 18 U.S.C. § 922(l), and NFA, 26 U.S.C. § 5844, generally prohibit the importation of ‘firearm silencers’, except under certain authorized exceptions and with required licensing and registration,” the letter reads.
The ATF asks anyone with a solvent trap to contact their local field office to divest themselves from the device. If a user is unsure if their solvent trap qualifies as a suppressor, the ATF also asks the owner to contact the field office. The ATF doesn’t mention any immunity for the owner.
AmmoLand News would strongly encourage its readers to seek legal counsel before ever contacting the ATF.
All Ffls – Nov 2023 – Open Letter – Solvent Trap Devices
About John Crump
John is a NRA instructor and a constitutional activist; he has written about firearms and interviewed people of all walks of life. Mr. Crump lives in Northern Virginia with his wife and sons and can be followed on X at @crumpyss, or at www.crumpy.com.
Live Inventory Price Checker
Elite Ifm7 Suppressor 7.62 Direct Thread - Elite Ifm7 Suppressor 7.62 Quick Detach Brown | Brownells.com | $ 1899.99 |
|
|
Rugged Suppressors Surge 7.62 Modular Suppressor | Rainier Arms | $ 945.00 |
|
|
OSS Suppressors HX-QD 556 Ti Suppressor 5.56NATO Titanium | GrabAGun | $ 1230.99 |
|
|
Rugged Suppressors Radiant762, 7.62mm, Black, Suppressor | BattleHawk Armory | $ 1335.00 $ 1044.00 |
|
It is a single, very small step from “solvent traps have always been suppressors” to “AR-15’s have always been machineguns”.
The weasels work everyday on government salaries to erode our freedom. They take the long view. You make a very valid point.
Weasels AKA PSYCHOPATHIC CONTROL FREAK PARASITES. Or any one of those words or combinations there of.
After all, if you have the correct parts to install, it would take what? 30 minutes with a mill and drill? So their definition of “readily convertible” would apply if you look at it that way, don’t you think?
They just changed the definition of “readily” in one of their bs rules, so that something that takes 8 full hours in a fully functioning machine shop qualifies as “readily”. In that time with those resources, one could make a machine gun from scratch. The FBATFE are blatantly violating civil rights, claiming they can send a person to jail for just one non-functioning part of what they claim is a suppressor, while admitting it cannot be used as is, and is not a suppressor currently. Like a block of metal is now a receiver… NO, they aren’t, and you cannot… Read more »
The NFA is unconstitutional as admitted by the senate and AG in debate before passing it. Even if it were allowed, suppressors, SBR’s and even machine guns are owned in excess of the Supreme Court case’s 140,000 cutoff per Caetano for “in common use”. Thus, they are not and cannot be “dangerous and unusual”, and thus they cannot be restricted under the NFA for being so. Either way, they are the birthright of every American.
Birthright? What rights? The Federal government long ago abandoned any pretense of “inalienable citizen’s rights”. Rights are a fantasy. There are government granted privileges for those who deserve them, and sorry, but citizens like you and I don’t qualify, and never will.
It’s like SEAL Chief Eddie Gallagher stated, in response to what he learned through his legal battles with his Navy command, JAG, and NCIS. He said: “I’ve learned that you have the rights you can afford to defend.” That’s another way of saying, unless you’re rich or well connected (re: Hunter Biden), you don’t have any rights.
Sounds like you have surrendered. We have the rights we exercise and defend. The gov is certainly violating much of the Constitution, as are many states, but that’s no reason to roll over, or surrender, or stop exercising your rights.
The PSYCHOAPTHIC CONTROL FREAK PARASITES administering government are certainly violating…
The “Federal government” is not a sentient being. We need to rethink the use of the word government. What needs to be said is that the PSYCHOPATHIC CONTROL FREAK PARASITES that are administering government, long ago abandoned…
Like I sometimes call them the group of baboons IE congress, those in congress act more like baboons everyday
I have extensively looked at the subject of the NFA and have a post that you and others may find quite revealing…What Was The LOGIC Behind the NFA?
Good read, you may wanna add how the AG at the time admitted it was unconstitutional, which was why they taxed rather than banned, and admitted they knew the gangsters wouldn’t pay the tax and would travel out of state with the weapons, subjecting them to arrest by the fbi, whereas local cops couldn’t chase them out of their jurisdiction. Yup, the entire nfa was to create a way to bust gangsters running booze.
Excellent and true.
The sum total of all law SHOULD be “do not cause, nor cause to be caused, loss, harm or damage”
Per Caetano v. MA 200,000 is the threshold for an arm to be in common use therefore per Heller v. DC can’t be banned. Suppressors & SBR’s meet the threshold; however, the ATF will not voluntarily go to the DC circuit court requesting a ruling that the NFA suppressor & SBR text be struck. The ATF won’t voluntarily give up their $200 tax stream.
I keep a few spare oil filters in my shop. For some reason, I’ll get to going on changing the oil in my truck and then I reach for a filter and nothing… I don’t have one.. I can’t get the filter I need in town, I have to order it.
Gosh, I hope when the ATF raids me, I don’t get arrested for an illegal hoard of oil filters.
Exactly what I thought reading this.
Are you kidding, there was a shop in California that was raided about 2 years ago, that had about 100 different oil filters in stock. It turns out that certain types of oil filters can be used as silencers as well with just one small part called an adapter, the atf closed that auto shop down and sent the mechanics to prison for years for doing nothing more than working on cars.
Looks like the ATF’s entire reason for being, under the authoritarian socialist, unelected, Democrat regime is the entrapment and imprisonment of citizens who didn’t vote their “their guy”. The self-evident fact is that that the ATF is now (and probably always has been) a partisan, lawless organization, where leftist activists are paid 6-figure-plus salaries to work 24/7 AGAINST the rights and freedoms of the American people. Any politician who supports the NFA, and ATF it created, or opposes abolishing both, is him/her/itself a lawless activist, and a danger to Constitutionally guaranteed freedoms. Once they were able to install a puppet… Read more »
so is fbi, what else is new
They are “part and parcel” of the “Standing Army” that the Declaration of Independence warned us about!
And that the US Constitution is specifically AGAINST.
“No, Sean Hannity, most of these “line agents” are NOT patriots, are NOT good guys led by bad supervisors and politicians. Most are again, LAWLESS partisans, leftist activists who violated their oaths of office 10 seconds after they took it.” Seems to me that this statement describes PSYCHOPATHIC CONTROL FREAK PARASITES to the TEE!
Now surely the government wouldn’t be setting a trap would they? Wink,wink
There are solvent traps and then there are solvent traps.
There are solvent traps then there are the mufflers that are used on model boats.
Next step?
Get ready to pay the $200 transfer tax on your next oil filter purchase.
Feel free to look up the videos for yourself.
It’s the wacko environmentalists goal.. All electric.
I did see a “free oil change” sign at my local oil change shop. It did say, limited to Tesla’s only.
Headed westbound on FL60, as you cross from PolK County to Hilslborough County ,at the intersection of FL60 and (wait for it) County Line Road you will see a scruffy looking bar with a sign that on one trip said:
FREE BEER
TOPLESS BARMAIDS
FALSE ADVERTISING
Love that area and Grady Judd is a national treasure.
Maybe the courts will consider oil filters to be in common use and take oil filters out of the equation.
By ATF LOGIC( a part is the same as the whole thing) since I have 1 one dollar bill I am now a billionaire !
Shall not be infringed. It is time to deal with these anti American, government letter agencies with the gun. Who asked what there opinion was anyway? Free American male!!! I’ll do what I want with my firearms I don’t need input from government overwatch.. GFY!!!
You should have 50 likes but so many are afraid of being on a list.
My question is, how would the ATF know if someone is using a solvent trap as the basis for building a suppressor as you don’t provide a picture with a form 1 application?
They use pre cogs to figure it all out. Minority Report’s genre has been changed to a documentary.
I’ve finally figured out why the ATF is so intent to make their own laws today, and why our gov’t is so intent to squelch any talk about 2A….. in 1934, and 1968 when the NFA was enacted, there was no thing as the internet. Nobody could have a realistic conversation with literally millions of others to discuss our own constitutional rights. Now, we can post, like this one, and reach an unlimited number of people who might share our same opinion. And also we are TEACHING others of their rights guaranteed to them. The gov’t doesn’t like this. So,… Read more »
ATF has always been a gestapo full of Nazis.
Solvent trap suppressors, forced reset triggers, and bump stocks all demonstrate that the number one “crime” enforced by the ATF is the unwritten law against finding a way to make a legal item that evades the wishes of the ATF. When legal scholars look at FRT and bump stock cases, where the courts have used the cases to rein in all federal agencies and make it clear that they only have the authority to make the specific rules anticipated by congress when it gave them rulemaking authority, scholars will see the fights for FRTs and bump stocks as victories for… Read more »
Fatf! Up, down and sideways.
So even an oil filter for a small engine would be illegal. How about the 6 inch long muffler for a lawnmower.
I am so deaf already from years of exposure to extreme noise I don’t need anything to lower sound. My government hearing aids don’t help much in hearg
I know a few people that use solvent traps as mufflers for their model boats, they work very well for cutting down the noise and the exhaust fumes as well. These parts can be used for more than just silencers, the ones the boat racers have are only being as parts for model boat engines as they have holes ported into the sides of them at various points. They work very well in cutting down not only the fumes and the sound but they look great too boot.
May want to credit the photographer for use of his photo…
If BATF&E says solvent traps are not in their vocabulary, how can they now say they are suppressors?
ATF has not classified any device as a ‘solvent trap,’ because that term does not exist in the relevant Federal statutes or implementing regulations.”
By the same token, atf always was a bunch of tyrannicaI jack-booted thugs.
At most, these “solvent traps” are 80% devices, and the ATF should leave them the heck alone. Just like 80% AR’s and pistol frames these things are just pieces of metal. and should be considered such. If someone decides to convert them, then it should be considered the same and someone converting a chunk of metal into an operating AR lower or a piece of polymer into a pistol frame. We have rights and these rights allow us to do what the heck we please. The ATF needs to simply do its job and stop the witch hunt. Same thing… Read more »
Duct tape and a 32 oz soda bottle are now NFA items. So are parts on the shelf at Home Improvement and plumbing supply houses. And parts found in every welders and machine shops are now also illegal.
Sprinkler installers, and muffler shops too.
Wall mart then is now in violation
I am just waiting (not holding my breath) for the first State to step up and make it law that any suppressor built within the State can be legally sold and used by citizens within said State. Since the product does not cross State lines the Feds have no say in the matter. What say you State Legislators?
TX has such a law which has been challenged in the 5th circuit.
While I hate to agree with them,lets face it – they are correct