Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) announced the filing of its opening brief with the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals in Fort v. Grisham, its lawsuit that challenges the New Mexico governor’s total ban on carry in public parks and playgrounds. The brief can be viewed at FPCLegal.org.
“The Governor’s restrictions are particularly perverse because they prohibit individuals in locations such as parks and playgrounds—that Defendants assert are ‘vulnerable’—from arming themselves for their own defense and the defense of their children and grandchildren,” argues the brief. “That flatly contradicts the Founding-era solution, which was to ensure that all members of ‘the people’ were armed, to protect not only themselves but also the ‘vulnerable’ in society who are incapable of armed self-defense. The Governor’s carry restrictions violate the Second Amendment and should be enjoined.”
“Governor Grisham’s so-called ‘emergency order’ is, in truth, nothing more than an unconstitutional executive fiat preventing peaceable New Mexicans from protecting themselves, their loved ones, and their community,” said Cody J. Wisniewski, FPC Action Foundation’s Vice President and General Counsel, and counsel for FPC. “Perhaps the most offensive feature of the governor’s order is that it prohibits licensed New Mexicans from possessing arms in areas that the government has identified as places at risk for attacks by criminals. In other words, the governor is intentionally seeking to disarm peaceable New Mexicans in the place where those individuals need protection the most. We look forward to the Court putting an end to this morally bankrupt executive fiat.”
FPC is joined in the litigation by the Second Amendment Foundation and New Mexico Shooting Sports Association.
Individuals who would like to join the FPC Grassroots Army and support important pro-rights lawsuits and programs like these can sign up at JoinFPC.org. Individuals and organizations wanting to support charitable efforts in support of the restoration of Second Amendment and other natural rights can also make a tax-deductible donation to the FPC Action Foundation. For more on FPC’s lawsuits and other pro-Second Amendment initiatives, visit FPCLegal.org and follow FPC on Instagram, X (Twitter), Facebook, YouTube.
About Firearms Policy Coalition
Firearms Policy Coalition (firearmspolicy.org), a 501(c)4 nonprofit organization, exists to create a world of maximal human liberty, defend constitutional rights, advance individual liberty, and restore freedom. FPC’s efforts are focused on the Right to Keep and Bear Arms and adjacent issues including freedom of speech, due process, unlawful searches and seizures, separation of powers, asset forfeitures, privacy, encryption, and limited government. The FPC team are next-generation advocates working to achieve the Organization’s strategic objectives through litigation, research, scholarly publications, amicus briefing, legislative and regulatory action, grassroots activism, education, outreach, and other programs.
FPC Law (FPCLaw.org) is the nation’s first and largest public interest legal team focused on the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, and the leader in the Second Amendment litigation and research space.
FPC Action Foundation (FPCActionFoundation.org), a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, exists to create a world of maximal human liberty through charitable legal action, public policy, education, and research programs.
Since the Muslim president made a law that having a gun in a national park is allowed and legal, who does she think she is?
If you’re permitted to carry in the state the park is located, you can carry in national parks, but not in buildings. I know that part sucks, but it’s not an outright ban.
She needs to be banned.
awaiting
Oh, goody! An incremental ban. Termites eat away slowly so that by the time you notice the damage, it’s TOO LATE.
Correct!
Hypothetically speaking, if you hike the Grand Canyon,
(in Arizona/Constitutional carry state) and you want to go to the store at Phantom Ranch, you’ll have to leave your firearm, unsecured, in your pack outside the store. That store is also a post office so you’re double screwed. Leaving a firearm unsecured doesn’t sit well with me, neither does being excluded from reasonably normal activity.
Just one more reason the Supreme Court’s Bruin decision is going to change things for the better.
The Governor’s policies certainly discourage me from tourism spending when I pass through her state. Ask her if she’s comfortable strolling unarmed and without armed escort through those areas in which she’s prohibited even law-abiding, licensed citizens to carry. I would, if necessary, protect her with my gun and my life. Too bad she seems to lack the wisdom to tell her friends from her enemies.