In a bold move that underscores the ongoing battle over Second Amendment rights, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, along with other state attorneys and gun rights advocates, has announced a lawsuit against the Biden administration. The legal challenge targets what Paxton describes as an “unlawful ban” on private firearms sales imposed by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF).
During a news conference held in Texas, Paxton, joined by Kansas Attorney General Chris Kobach and representatives from Gun Owners of America, expressed their concerns over the new ATF rule that redefines the statutory terms related to firearm sales. This rule, according to Paxton, could potentially criminalize hundreds of thousands of law-abiding Americans who engage in private firearm transactions.
“The Biden administration is weaponizing the federal bureaucracy against our constitutional rights,” Paxton stated, emphasizing the perceived overreach of the federal government in matters traditionally preserved for individual states and citizens.
This lawsuit is not an isolated event but part of a broader trend where state officials are increasingly confronting federal authority over gun laws.
The coalition, including Louisiana, Missouri, and Utah, argues that the ATF’s redefinition efforts circumvent the legislative process and infringe upon the rights protected by the U.S. Constitution.
Historically, private firearm sales have not required the same level of regulation as those conducted through licensed dealers. However, the new ATF rule seeks to tighten these requirements, ostensibly to close the so-called “gun show loophole.” Critics, however, rightly view this as a direct attack on their rights and a misinterpretation of existing laws.
The case highlights the complex interplay between gun rights, rogue regulatory agencies, and constitutional protections. As states rally to defend what they correctly perceive as an encroachment on their rights, the legal battles are set to intensify, potentially setting the stage for future Supreme Court debates.
In a statement that resonates deeply with supporters of the Second Amendment, Paxton reiterated a defiant message to the federal government: “Come and take it.” This reference to historical defiance and resilience underlines the deep-seated resistance against perceived federal overreach and sets a contentious tone for the legal proceedings ahead.
As the lawsuit progresses, it will undoubtedly attract significant attention from both legal experts and advocates on both sides of the gun control debate, marking another chapter in the complex narrative of America’s relationship with firearms.
Per Bruen just about all 23,000 gun laws are unconstitutional, including FBATFE rules. Per the 2nd amendment, all gun laws are Unconstitutional.Any law or rule or policy that limits, restricts, bans, requires permission permits or training is by definition an infringement, which has no power. All infringements are repugnant to the Constitution and have no lawful authority.
there may be one that is legal remember they were going to put in constitution requirement to have a gun 20 shot and powder, so training might pass muster
Only 5 states argue the re-definition per this article.
United we stand.
Oregoneistan
Trump/Noem 2024
Up-voted to bring you back to zero. Azzholes gonna azzhole.
And Texas is not listed in the court filing. Very confusing.
a total of 26 states and their AGs are involved; that’s over half the country.
You mean Noem the puppy and goat killer?
have never met a politician that was not fos..it
I don’t watch fake news channels and I don’t GAS what any of them say. They lie and even produce liars to try and kill a republican in a court of law because they know the right does not like liars, thieves and adulterers.
Everyone will handle it in their own way just like Trump.
Yeah that one, city boy.