Biden’s hometown AG cares less about the Constitution than he does

Delaware Attorney General Kathy Jennings. (Photo courtesy Delaware Department of Justice).

To understand what would happen to our Second Amendment rights if the Constitution unburdened Joe Biden, the Supreme Court, or any political opposition, look no further than his deep-blue state of Delaware.

Democrats control Delaware’s entire General Assembly, the governor’s office and most boards, commissions, judgeships and appointments. It shows.

ARs and scores of other popular semi-autos are banned, as are standard-capacity magazines. Delawareans must obtain a state permit to simply purchase a handgun. There are red flags, universal background checks, homemade firearm prohibitions and don’t even think of standing your ground. Everytown ranks The First State 12th nationally in terms of its anti-gun laws. In fact, the state has become a gun controller’s dream.

Delaware Attorney General Kathy Jennings is responsible for many of the most recent anti-gun laws, and she vigorously defends their constitutionality in court, even though she knows many are no longer constitutional.

“I spend each and every day fighting gun violence in our state,” Jennings said in a video posted on her social media. She did not return calls or emails seeking her comments for this story.

A deep dive into Jennings’ taxpayer-funded anti-gun activism reveals that she – like her friend Joe Biden – doesn’t let the Constitution get in her way. When Jennings wants to infringe upon the Second Amendment, the Constitution isn’t even an afterthought.

“Attorney General Jennings along with Governor Carney together serve as a clear and present danger to the Constitution of the United States when it comes to the Second and Fourteenth Amendments and Art. I, Section 20 of the Delaware Constitution,” said John Sigler, past-president of the Delaware State Sportsmen’s Association, past-president of the National Rifle Association and senior member of the Delaware Bar.

Specious arguments

Jennings claims to possess a special insight and understanding of what the Founders actually meant when they wrote the Bill of Rights – especially the Second Amendment.

“The idea that the Founders envisioned anything like an AR-15 when they drafted the Constitution is a delusion,” Jennings said last month in a joint press release, along with Attorneys General from New Jersey and Pennsylvania. “These guns originated as weapons of war, were marketed based on their military pedigree, and have emerged as the clear weapon of choice for mass shooters at a time when guns are the leading cause of death for children in our country. The gun lobby’s continuing pursuit of blood money is appalling and flat-out wrong on the merits. We are proud to defend these laws.”

Jennings is partially correct, of course. It is highly unlikely the Founders ever envisioned an AR or an AK, but her argument is moot. It doesn’t matter what the Founders envisioned. Technology may change over time, but our civil rights don’t.

The Founders likely never envisioned offset presses, electric typewriters, cell phones, computers, texts, emails, online news sites, social media or TikTok influencers, yet they and their work product are protected by the First Amendment.

The Founders could never comprehend ATF’s knock-and-talk interrogations, electronic surveillance, Title III wire taps, no-knock search warrants, drones and FISA warrants, yet the Fourth Amendment protects Americans from these and other intrusions into their homes.

Jennings’ false claim that firearms are the leading cause of death for American children has been roundly debunked – even by the corporate media – yet she and Biden continue to repeat this falsehood when calling for increased firearm regulations.

Also, the Second Amendment has always protected weapons of war. That’s kind of the point.

Lawfare

June 23, 2022, was a dark day for Joe Biden, or more accurately for the unelected White House bureaucrats who control him and his teleprompter. The United States Supreme Court issued its landmark Bruen opinion, which curbs the State’s ability to wantonly regulate arms and invalidated many of the anti-gun laws already on the books.

The White House needed to push back against the High Court, and there was no better place to do it than Biden’s home state, which was under total Democrat control. At that time, Delaware’s legislative session was winding down. The Delaware State Sportsmen’s Association (DSSA) had successfully thwarted a handful of anti-gun bills.

Jennings, Gov. Carney and all members of the Democratic caucus from both chambers were suddenly summoned to a conference call with the White House. Afterward, the Democrats introduced a trio of anti-gun bills, which were fast-tracked through the legislative process. One lobbyist referred to it as a “blitzkrieg.”

One bill banned “assault weapons.” The second banned all magazines capable of holding more than 17-rounds. The third prohibited anyone under 21 from “purchasing, owning, possessing, or controlling a firearm or ammunition of a firearm except under limited circumstances.”

Jennings played a significant role in passing the legislation. She worked closely with far-left progressives in the General Assembly to carry out orders from the White House and – to be clear – she knew the bills were unconstitutional because of Bruen. One lawmaker objected on these grounds. “Sue us,” was the response he received. Another state representative tried to argue that since the bills raised serious constitutional issues, they should be given more time. He was ignored. A Democratic state representative later told the DSSA he had no choice but to support the bills. A massive amount of pressure, he said, was coming “from above.”

Gov. Carney signed the bills into law on June 30, 2022, just seven days after Bruen. The Biden-Harris administration needed a quick victory to push back against Bruen, and they got it.

The DSSA quickly sought to block the legislation, which is known as the Delaware Lethal Firearms Safety Act of 2022. On Monday, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals denied the DSSA’s motion to overturn the district court’s denial for a temporary injunction, while the DSSA is seeking a permanent injunction against the Act. The appellate court specifically refrained from ruling on the merits of the case.

Jennings has referred to the DSSA as “extremist NRA-affiliated plaintiffs,” but rather than using staff attorneys from her office to defend against the group’s suit, Jennings contracted with a private law firm. The DSSA has been told that some of the money for these private attorneys is coming from the gun-ban industry.

The lawsuit, Delaware State Sportsmen’s Association v. Delaware Department of Safety & Homeland Security, remains ongoing.

This story is presented by the Second Amendment Foundation’s Investigative Journalism Project and wouldn’t be possible without you. Please click here to make a tax-deductible donation to support more pro-gun stories like this.


About Lee Williams

Lee Williams, who is also known as “The Gun Writer,” is the chief editor of the Second Amendment Foundation’s Investigative Journalism Project. Until recently, he was also an editor for a daily newspaper in Florida. Before becoming an editor, Lee was an investigative reporter at newspapers in three states and a U.S. Territory. Before becoming a journalist, he worked as a police officer. Before becoming a cop, Lee served in the Army. He’s earned more than a dozen national journalism awards as a reporter, and three medals of valor as a cop. Lee is an avid tactical shooter.

Lee Williams

Subscribe
Notify of
26 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Colt

Kathy, Kamala, Kimberly… the KKK.
and who is shocked?
These women shouldn’t be in charge of Kindergarteners yet alone anything else.

JohnBored

Is Delaware the crime-free utopian state that the dims want us to emulate? Hardly. That the Delaware AG is a gun grabbing hypocrite is not surprising. What is surprising is that the sheep still vote for this nonsense.

swmft

they dumb them down in public schools, so they will do as they are told I wonder if they are putting something in the public water supply to control them estrogen has been found in water supply and females are more subservient

musicman44mag

You don’t know how much you nailed that on the spot. Here in Oregonistan where my leftist niece is now teaching 4th grade, God help our children, she says there is no longer an A,B,C,D grade because that is racist and everyone gets either a pass or fail. What do you need to get a pass you ask? Show up listen and then COMPLY her words, with what you have been taught.
Aint that just great!!!!!

swmft

comply………looking for slaves

swmft

teaching is instilling polite discourse and reason not subservience

swmft

it is funny you think they did not see repeating guns coming? there have been multi barreled cannons ,muskets patch box some dating from 1600s while not common these were educated men and would have been able to guess where arms development was going

JohnBored

Of course, the Founders were prescient enough to envision repeating firearms. Leonardo DaVinci made designs of repeating firearms in the 15th century, along with tanks and flying machines. Practical, modern engineering made these devices possible. The Founders drafted the Constitution with a Bill of Rights that provided for the citizens to keep and bear arms. The arms they had in mind were the Assault Rifles of their day, muskets and rifles with rifling. Also, smooth bore cannons.

Laddyboy

In and about 1780, the Garandoni Rifle was produced and used in Military of other countries. In or about 1803 Louis and Clark went on an EXPEDITION. On this expedition they had a Garandoni “.46Caliber” rifle that had a 21-22 round magazine. This RIFLE amazed many of the Indian Tribes they met along the way. A “show” was put on at each meeting. This REPEATING RIFLE could harvest deer.

swmft

46 caliber could take buffalo

gregs

her comments on the 2A are especially ignorant. didn’t civilians in 1791 have the same firearms as the military? the AR-15 is not a military weapon, it does not shoot select fire or fully automatic. it is not used most often for “mass shootings”. https://www.thetrace.org/2023/07/mass-shooting-type-of-gun-used-data/ it is not the leading cause of death in children in America, unless you count 18 and 19 year old children, but most call them adults. the gun control lobby’s pursuit of total civilian disarmament is appalling and what is is totally wrong in its merits. and it is what is causing blood to run… Read more »

Laddyboy

She IS BOTH a STUPID IDIOT and a BLATANT LIAR! she just repeats the MOCKING-BIRD montra of the DemoKKKratic National COMMUNISTS that are trying to commit a COUP against the American Citizens!

Roland T. Gunner

Our AR’s dot not fire in fully automatic, BUT THEY SHOULD!

swmft

learn how to machine yours and get the tools, does not take much,you may need it, better ready than dead

swmft

she is both a liar and idiot

swmft

early on many individuals had better arms than government could supply , first machine guns were owned by individuals.

GunE8

In a more perfect world, added-
“The Founders likely never envisioned or could have comprehended such incompetent and/or politically corrupt (read treacherous) politicians betraying their constituents for personal gain.”

IMHO, perhaps Lee Williams and so many others aptly commenting, responding or criticizing anti-gunners, especially “oath-sworn” politicians, should start thinking of “literally” placing them in the proper light: corrupt or idealistic, (matters not which). More offense is needed in countering the blitzkrieg of intentional, elitist-funded unconstitutuonal attacks on our rights.

Softy

Does anybody ask that skank the important question? Will she strut her butt around her town with an unarmed security detail? When these high ranking stuck up biotches, who think they’re stuff don’t stink, give up they’re automatics that they’re security details carry, maybe, but I doubt, they may realize why so many “regular” Americans own and carry firearms. They created this utopia that we live in, and won’t stop until they have total control of the masses where the dumbokkkrats have said that you won’t own anything and you’ll be happy. More reasons that we need ALL gun owners… Read more »

Terry

Dumb bitch – nuff said!

Boz

Well, then……lt’s Marie Antoinette-time!

Why did they execute Marie Antoinette?

At 4 in the morning on 16 October, she was found guilty of the three main charges against her: conspiring with foreign powers, the depletion of the state treasury, and of committing high treason by acting against the security of the French state. The prosecution asked for, and was granted, the death penalty.

These current traitors in the U.S. Government have done far worse.

hasbeen

you know, when women started getting out of the house and into “business” everything went to hell. anyone else see the correlation?

Bob

When will the moronic DAs and Democrats in general wake up and understand more laws against law abiding gun owners doesn’t do a damn thing to stop crimes committed with firearms. Enforcement of laws against committing violent crimes with a firearm and locking up those who commit crimes is what is needed. Look at Chicago with some of the most strict gun control laws to see how passing more laws doesn’t work. The same can be said for virtually every major Metropolitan area and states controlled by Democrats to see what a abject failure the passage of more gun control… Read more »

JohnBored

The moronic DA’s and dims in general could care less about stopping crimes with firearms. It is all about marginalizing the population and making us more dependent on Big Brother. Big Brother is all the protection you need from thugs and predators. They want to control, not serve the citizens. They want to reduce us from citizens to serfs and peasants. The don’t want citizens, they want subjects. We serve them, they do not serve us.

Roland T. Gunner

Seriously Lee? Of COURSE our Founding Fathers envisioned firearms lije AR’s and AK’s; they are the natural evolution of firearms technology that EVERY gunsmith envisioned and was slowly working toward. I am sure they envisioned almost of the technological wonders you mentioned; perhaps only as sci-fi like the work of Jules Vern and HG Wells, but they envisioned them.

That woman is the Whore of Babylon.

NDevr2Persevere

Another reason to NEVER vote demonrats into the office of dog catcher!!! Then they will pass a law to not allow police to put a gun on their fur missiles!!! Idiots!!!

Vince

Jennings won the election because her election photo showed the top three buttons of her blouse unbuttoned! Men are dumb sometimes!