Recent Grizzly Bear Attacks Should Alarm Anti-gun Washington

Grizzly bear roaring in forest iStock-Byrdyak 914770576
Grizzly bear attacks in Montana and Idaho should serve as cautionary tales for Washington residents facing a grizzly reintroduction effort in that state’s North Cascades. iStock-Byrdyak 914770576

Another incident involving a grizzly bear attack in Montana should serve as a cautionary warning to people advocating for the reintroduction of grizzly bears into north-central Washington’s North Cascades region, but will anyone pay attention?

CBS News reported a sow grizzly with two cubs was shot by a hunter she chased up a tree and was subsequently killed by personnel from the Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks (FWP) on Oct. 5. The incident happened in Gallatin County, and the hunter fired at the approaching bruin with a handgun before climbing to safety. The CBS report said he was hunting in the Hidden Lakes area.

Nationally recognized self-defense expert Massad Ayoob has acknowledged during at least one Gun Rights Policy Conference that defending one’s self could involve wild animal attacks, and not just defense against criminals.

Incidents such as this are worrisome to people living in the area where earlier this year, the Biden-Harris administration announced it was moving forward with a plan to reintroduce grizzlies, even against strong opposition from people living in the immediate area.

The effort will take place over an extended period, with three to seven bears per year transplanted over the course of five to 10 years to establish a population of 25 bears, according to KCPQ News in Seattle, the local Fox News affiliate.

The latest incident was preceded by September attack on a bowhunter in southeast Idaho’s Island Park area, just south of the Idaho-Montana border. In that incident, the hunter sustained non-life threatening injuries, according to NBC News, but he was bitten. The hunter and a partner both fired handguns at the bear, killing it. They called for help and the injured man was taken by helicopter to the hospital and treated.

This past April, another man was hunting for antler sheds along Wolf Creek, north and west of Helena, when he had to fatally shoot a grizzly on private land, according to FWP. He encountered the bear, which reportedly charged at him from a distance of 20 yards, and he fired five shots from a handgun when the bear was between 30 and 10 feet away. The man was not injured, and FWP said he was not carrying bear spray. This bear was also a sow with a single cub, which was subsequently captured and taken to a wildlife rehabilitation center in Helena, with the intention of placing it in a zoo.

According to the Daily Montanan, the latest grizzly incident was the first for October and the first killed since Sept. 19. It was also the 24th known human-caused grizzly death this year.

As noted by the Outdoor Wire, FWP has advised hunters to:

  • Carry bear spray and be prepared to use it immediately.
  • Watch for and be extra cautious around bear sign, creeks and areas with limited visibility. Most attacks happen in surprise, close encounters.
  • Hunt with a group of people. This can help you make localized noise to alert bears to your presence, and it may also increase your chances of survival in the event of a bear attack.
  • Be aware that elk calls and cover scents can attract bears.
  • Bring the equipment and people needed to help field dress game and remove the meat from the kill site as soon as possible.
  • If you need to leave part of the meat in the field during retrieval, hang it at least 10 feet off the ground and at least 150 yards from the gut pile. Leave it where it can be observed from a distance of at least 200 yards.
  • Upon your return, observe the meat with binoculars. Make noise while approaching the meat. If it has been disturbed or if a bear is in the area, leave and call FWP.
  • Follow food storage orders from the applicable land management agency.

So how does all of this figure in the Washington state controversy? Much of the area identified as the reintroduction zone is within the boundaries of the North Cascades National Park, and lands surrounding the park are primarily within the Okanogan-Wenatchee national forest. The area is popular for big game hunting, as well as summer hiking, backpacking, wilderness camping and trail riding.

But local residents opposed to the project repeatedly warned proponents and the agencies involved that grizzly bears, just like other predators, do not stay put. They will roam all over the region, looking for food.

Based on the recent experiences in Montana and Idaho, it is more than just conceivable that bear-human encounters will occur.

Perhaps not surprisingly, bear advocates primarily live outside the region. Ranchers particularly are concerned because the area has a long history of cattle ranching, and they are worried about conflicts and losses.

Some Evergreen State big game hunters are concerned that, over time, wildlife managers may start limiting hunting opportunities. The region is known for its mule deer hunting opportunities, but grizzly reintroduction—essentially in the wake of wolf reintroduction—is a major red flag because deer are the natural prey of predators.

The CBS News report noted, “Multiple bear attacks have been reported in Montana in recent months…In mid-August, a three-year-old girl was attacked by a black bear while she was in a tent at a private campground just north of Yellowstone National Park. A bear believed to be involved was captured and euthanized hours after the incident.”

This past July, a 72-year-old man killed a grizzly in Flathead County after it charged him while he was picking berries. That man was hospitalized after the attack, CBS News reported. FWP said the man was picking berries alone, and he also used a handgun to dispatch the attacking bruin.

Publicizing these incidents may be criticized by bear proponents as fear mongering, but they happened, and to the people involved, they’re not just scary stories.


About Dave Workman

Dave Workman

Subscribe
Notify of
23 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Darkman

Anyone and I mean Anyone who ventures into Bear and/or Big Cat country unarmed without a firearm of sufficient size to neutralize the threat is just asking to become scat of either variety. Even when I visited and camped in Yellowstone 25 years ago I was packing serious firepower.

Montana454Casull

When grizzley bears chew up unarmed liberals I consider it a win , win .

Cappy

I’m not sure the grizz population checks voter registration cards before dining. I am pretty sure that the eastern portion of Washington state is distinctly more conservative than the commie coastal areas. Of course, more right-leaning residents aren’t so stupid as to venture into bear country without taking proper equipment. This situation may be a self-resolving issue.

Get Out

Concur, doubt a bear would pass up a meal based off of one’s political affiliation, a right-leaning family member with 3 children went to Yellowstone two years ago and had to turn around on a hiking trail due to a bear threat, he was unarmed at the time too.

Context Warrior

The cities of Seattle (all of King County), Tacoma, Vancouver, and Spokane are all areas where grizzlies traditionally were located. I propose reintroducing the bears in great numbers to these areas where the support for the reintroduction is the highest. It certainly would help with the homeless problems in those areas.

Wild Bill

Speaking of “Alarming Anti-Gun Washington” District of Corruption, your article in the November issue of “Guns” magazine pointed out how we can legally overthrow the leftist federal government. No leftist president, no leftist executive branch, no leftist USDOJ, no leftists alphabet agencies, and no leftist Congress all weaponized agains gun owners. This could be a chance for an overthrow of the entire leftist government, all without firing a shot!

This is a good article, and the Nov “Guns” article is dynamite!

Please everyone go vote and take your family to vote, too!

Wild Bill

Ok!

Nick

If they’re not alarmed by crime and zombies everywhere, why would they be alarmed by bears?
You can’t rationalize the irrational.

DDS

Ko-Ko likes the idea of a bear release, but thinks they should be released into the big blue anti-gun cities rather than in the sticks.

“As some day it may happen that a victim must be found
I’ve got a little list — I’ve got a little list
Of society offenders who might well be underground
And who never would be missed — who never would be missed!”

https://genius.com/Gilbert-and-sullivan-ive-got-a-little-list-lyrics

hasbeen

why would washington dc care about grizzles? last report there were no grizzle bears in washington dc of maryland.

Wild Bill

Washington, District of Corruption, doesn’t care about grizzles. WDC only cares about maintaining their own power. Throw the betraying bastards out.

Straight-Shootr

Grizzle bears have been in NCW for at >least< 20 years. There is a device called a smoke plate wildlife inventory ‘trap.’ They coat a plate of glass with soot and put it in a box with some bait, and only one entrance. The little critters wander over the soot plate, and leave little footie prints in the soot. Something kept tearing the plate traps all asunder, and nobody knew what it was, UNTIL they finally found a shredded smoke plate box, but some how the plate had survived. On the face of the plate was the print of a… Read more »

Novice.but.learning

Dean Weingarten has published some interesting statistics that the Interagency Grizzly Bear Committee, the National Park Service, Fish and Wildlife agencies for Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, and elsewhere ignore. Read one of his insightful articles at: Why Firing a Handgun or Spraying Bear Spray Matters (ammoland.com). Currently the Lower 48 states have a population of about 2,000 grizzlies. Of that population, about 70% are adults. Do a little math. For the past couple of years we’ve averaged about 7 grizzly bear deaths and associated maulings of people. We’ve also seen 1 or two fatalities caused by grizzly bears. So… Read more »

Last edited 1 month ago by Novice.but.learning
Finnky

So one mauling per year per 200 bears. If we had a group of people among whom 0.5% of them seriously injured or killed someone every year, we’d be all over that – right? Oh wait… isn’t homicide rate among gang members far higher than that? Guess if it’s OK for grizzlies – it’s OK for other types of animals as well. OTOH – Pitbulls are much vilified over an extremely small number of maulings – and there are far more pitbulls than there are gang members. So maybe public outrage is fickle – ignore dangerous bears, considerably more dangerous… Read more »

DDS

Ron White had a few good thought on the interaction between humans and grizzlies

https://www.google.com/search?q=ron+white+movie+about+grizzly&client=firefox-b-1-d&oq=ron+white++movie+grizzly#fpstate=ive&vld=cid:47f3b4cf,vid:6UMWndnqyFE,st:0

This is an area where the foolishness of NIMBY (Not In My Back Yard) shows up. if you want wolves, grizzlies, whatever, reintroduced into their historical ranges, you should be willing to take one home with you.

Last edited 1 month ago by DDS
CBW

If they introduce GRIZZLIES in Washington without the residents consent, locals should use dogs and go slaughter every grizzly they let loose. Tyranny needs to die.

FL-GA

“Hunt with a group of people. This can help you make localized noise to alert bears to your presence”.
Really? Who wrote this? What is her/his real agenda?

Finnky

Don’t you know that bears are flighty and easily scared away by sounds deer would not even notice? Where deer are likely to see you as an intruder and attack you, bears quietly disappear so that you never even know they were there.