Washington Anti-Gunners Flaunt Restrictive 2025 Agenda

WA Appeals Court Unanimously Upholds Preemption in SAF Lawsuit, iStock-884168778
Washington state will be a battleground in 2025, as anti-gunners have announced a restrictive legislative agenda. iStock-884168778

With a Democrat majority in the Washington Legislature and a new governor, Bob Ferguson, who has not been friendly to the Second Amendment, coming into office, Evergreen State anti-gunners are pushing their 2025 legislative agenda, and it is loaded with new restrictions.

Indeed, attorney William Kirk, president of Washington Gun Law, has just posted a 10-minute YouTube video titled “How Washington State Wants to Disarm You in 2025.” He essentially takes apart the seven-point agenda posted by the Seattle-based and billionaire-backed Alliance for Gun Responsibility.

As a testament to how bad this agenda is, Kirk suggests his audience should hit “Pause,” grab themselves a stiff shot of bourbon, do some breathing exercises, “or just grab a barf bag.”

Topping the list: A permit-to-purchase requirement, which has been rejected in the past and, in neighboring Oregon, ruled unconstitutional by a county circuit judge last year as part of Measure 114.

“This is one that many, many gun grabbing states are big on,” Kirk declares.

In their press release announcing the new agenda, the Alliance states, “According to research conducted by Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Violence Solutions, if Washington had adopted a Permit-to-Purchase law when Connecticut did, there would have been an estimated 1,205 fewer gun deaths in Washington over the first 10 years of implementation.”

It is speculation at best, critics might argue, a desired conclusion around which research was built.

The agenda also once again takes a shot at dismantling Washington state’s 40-year-old firearms preemption statute, which has served as a model for many, if not most, of similar laws adopted by other states over the past four decades. The gun prohibition lobby has despised this law since it took effect, with a string of mayors in Seattle and other large Washington cities who want their jurisdictions to essentially be anti-gun fiefdoms. Preemption was adopted to bring uniformity to state gun law from border to border rather than a checkerboard of confusing and often conflicting laws.

The 2025 Legislative Action Group is already gearing up for a bare-knuckles political fight.

There is also a safe storage requirement, which may be of questionable constitutionality under the 2008 Supreme Court’s Heller ruling.

And then comes a new tax on firearms and ammunition, an idea that was adopted by the Seattle City Council almost ten years ago, to reduce homicide and “gun violence.” In the years since the number of homicides in the city has gone up—300 percent in 2023—not down, and violent crime involving firearms has gone up as well. The tax has never come close to the original revenue projection.

How did this happen? It’s a matter of politics.

  • Gun owners are lethargic and apathetic, so they don’t vote. This allows anti-gunners to elect their candidates.
  • Many blame the state Republican Party for being ineffective, and over the past few cycles, plagued with infighting between moderates and conservatives.
  • Another theory is the national GOP has essentially written off the entire West Coast, providing token support for state-level political candidates.
  • Democrats benefit from strong financial support from wealthy elitists including Microsoft founder Bill Gates and other Microsoft alumni including Steve Ballmer. State Republicans simply cannot compete when the money runs 20- to 50-to-1 against them.
  • There has been a growing exodus of gun owners to other, more gun-friendly states including neighboring Idaho, Montana, Arizona, Texas and Oklahoma. This weakens the “gun vote” even more, which delights and emboldens Seattle anti-gunners, and Democrats living along the I-5 corridor, to be even more extreme in their demands. It also further reinforces the image of Democrats as the party of gun prohibition.

What is odd about this is that Washington boasts some 700,000 active concealed pistol license holders. Gun ownership in the Evergreen State has always been part of the Pacific Northwest fabric.

Adding to the drama is the fact that Bellevue, Wash., is home to the Second Amendment Foundation and its sister organization, the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms. SAF is a leader in gun rights litigation, with some 60 cases currently in progress around the country, including some seeking review by the U.S. Supreme Court. Both groups describe themselves as being “behind enemy lines.”

The Legislature convenes early next month. Ferguson, who is presently the attorney general and boasts he has never lost a case to the “gun lobby,” pushed for the state’s ban on “large-capacity magazines” and so-called “assault weapons.”

The upcoming session has the earmarks of a political trainwreck for the Second Amendment and Article I, Section 24 of the state constitution.


About Dave Workman

Dave Workman is a senior editor at TheGunMag.com and Liberty Park Press, author of multiple books on the Right to Keep & Bear Arms, and formerly an NRA-certified firearms instructor.

Dave Workman

Subscribe
Notify of
21 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Montana454Casull

The liberal cancer that effects many states hates freedom and people having any rights . They prefer lawless chaos and crime . A big reset needs to happen for these delusional clowns real soon or these states will not be a place any rational person wants to live in .

Cappy

And that’s what is so difficult to understand. There’s an old joke about a patient telling his doctor, “It hurts when I do this.” To which the doctor replies, “Don’t do that.” I don’t think anyone wants to be robbed or beaten or burdened with abnormal taxes. And yet, you’ve got several states where that seems to be the norm and the populace just keeps voting for more of it. I’ve said it before, I’m glad I’m old. (and I’m glad I don’t life in Cali or the Pacific Northwest.)

Montana454Casull

We are on the right end of this because we have lived in the best of times and this liberal cancer that is infecting the country did not exist for the majority of time in our lives .

musicman44mag

I wish that were the case for this 66 year old. Took 20 years to get a state job because of my white privilege, when on the job I was set aside because I was the wrong color and especially that I am a male. My retirement age was changed without my consideration making me have to work longer to retire with full benefits, no special program to get anyone or anything to give me a first time home buyer anything, I did it the hard way 3 times. No first time car buyer program. No free college because I… Read more »

musicman44mag

Who would downvote that comment. Brought you back to zero.
I think the reset is going to start sometime after or during the inauguration, we will see.

Trussman

Hope you are right on the reset thing. However I have a feeling that we’re in for more of the same BS this time around, with the Dimwits/ RINOs fighting Trump at every turn. We’ll know as soon as his nominations come to Capitol Hill.

musicman44mag

Good luck Washington. You know we are both in the same boat even though we live in different states. Too bad we can’t join Idaho and Montana or cut the state in half making the North where all the radicals live what ever they want and the south a 2nd amendment sanctuary state.

Oldman

Gotta disagree Music. I live in the north part of WA and cannot take a move right now. I say we just send all the progressives to the penal colony in California, which we have yet established. They would probably be happy there with the crime, homeless, and pretty boy Newsome.

musicman44mag

I said it and I am in the same boat as you. Anything to get this insane BS to stop. Changing states could be the answer but no one seems to want it in my county.

Oldman

I will just say that the Pacific Northwest is one of the most pretty places to live with a very temperate climate compared to the east or midwest.
I think the people who live in the big cities here in WA and Oregone are the problem. I’m sticking to that story.

musicman44mag

Hey, I said that wrong, I should have said changing the borders of our states and joining others could be the answer and that’s my story and I’m stickin to it.
🙂

Tionico

tha would still fORCE me to break with my local community and move to a new location/ Not up for that.

think Lexington and Concord….

Oldman

The Supremes will be forced soon, I pray, to face the fact that states cannot subrogate the constitution by making their own laws regarding the RTKBA and rule on it.. I agree we are realllly close to Lexington and Concord.

J.galt

the supremes are slow walking and I won’t hold my breath…….the fact that the court refused to discipline hawaii for placing “the spirit of aloha” above the constitution and allowing the state to defy the court tells you all you need to know.

The supreme court is cucked and weak. When Thomas leaves we’ll have a court that “doesn’t know what a woman is” and I don’t see a path for idiots at that level of “political superiority” to uphold constitutional freedom

Oldman

As I understand it, and believe me I don’t know that much, the ‘court’ has no power to discipline, punish or otherwise perform a police order. That is up to the executive branch of government. I remember, back in the 50’s or 60’s, when George Wallace stood on the steps of a school trying to bar black kids from going to school. That had been deemed unconstitutional by all kinds of courts, but it was enforced by troops from state and federal national guards. The sole duty of the Supreme Court is to pass judgement on laws, edicts, and the… Read more »

Oldman

I am not sure Dave……hoping to, but I am dealing with an abcess on my foot right now.

Novice.but.learning

Just curioous: HOW MANY PERSONS on this forum voted, or better yet DONATED MONEY and VOTED, and even better yet DONATED MONEY, VOTED, and WORKED ON A CONSERVATIVE CANDIDATE’S CAMPAIGN in the last election, or even better yet… the last 3 elections?

Wild Bill

Trump vote. Trump donation. Last three elections.

Tionico

You fail to take into consideration how our elections have been run, going back a least as far as the one where Queen Christine ascended the throne ater the third “recount”, to include three cartons of mailin ballots “discovered” on a she;fin Seattle post office three weeks AfTER the election was closed.. and which cartons contained enough of the “correct” votes to put her ahead by less than 100 votes.

SK

The state of Washington should change their name to Stalingrad or something similar to reflect their ideologies.