Opinion
The 2024 elections brought significant changes to the political landscape, with Republicans taking control of the White House, Senate, and House of Representatives.
This shift has created a unique opportunity to push forward a legislative agenda that champions constitutional values, including the right to keep and bear arms. One piece of legislation at the forefront of this movement is Rep. Thomas Massie’s National Constitutional Carry Act (H.R. 9534), which aims to ensure that Americans can exercise their Second Amendment rights without interference from state or local restrictions.
What Is the National Constitutional Carry Act?
National Constitutional Carry Act (H.R. 9534), is a bold proposal to eliminate the patchwork of state laws that currently dictate where and how law-abiding citizens can carry firearms. Under this bill, states and localities would no longer be able to impose criminal or civil penalties on eligible individuals carrying firearms in public. The Act also invalidates existing regulations that penalize lawful gun owners for exercising their right to self-defense. This legislation ensures that the right to bear arms, as guaranteed by the Second and Fourteenth Amendments, is applied uniformly across all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and U.S. territories.
This bold bill seeks to end the patchwork of restrictive state and local gun laws, ensuring that all Americans can exercise their Second Amendment rights consistently across the country. Let’s break down what’s at stake.
What the Bill Does
H.R. 9534 guarantees the right to carry firearms nationwide by:
- Eliminating penalties: Prohibits states and localities from imposing criminal or civil penalties on law-abiding individuals carrying firearms in public.
- Overturning restrictive laws: Invalidates existing regulations that penalize lawful carry.
- Covering all U.S. territories: Ensures uniform rights across states, D.C., Puerto Rico, and other territories.
As Rep. Massie explains, “No one should have to beg the government to exercise a constitutionally protected right anywhere in the country.”
Key Data Points
- 29 states already allow constitutional carry. Despite fears from gun control advocates, these states have not devolved into chaos. In fact:
- A study in Ohio showed reduced gun-related crime in six cities after adopting constitutional carry.
- Gun control strongholds like California and Illinois continue to face staggering violence, contradicting claims that stricter gun laws ensure safety.
Hunter King of the National Association for Gun Rights emphasizes: Twenty-nine states have proven [gun control advocates] wrong. Crime rates remain stable or even decline under constitutional carry laws.
Why It’s Important
Supporters argue that this bill isn’t just about gun rights—it’s about reaffirming fundamental freedoms. The legislation:
- Removes barriers for law-abiding citizens to defend themselves and their families.
- Simplifies the legal landscape for gun owners traveling across state lines.
- Sends a message that the federal government stands with constitutional rights over bureaucratic overreach.
Patrick Parsons of the American Firearms Association notes, “For the past 15 years, anti-gun liberals have told everyone that states passing constitutional carry would experience violence like we haven’t seen since the ‘wild west’ days. Twenty-nine states have proven them wrong, all while gun-control strongholds like DC, Chicago, and California have descended into violence and deadly chaos.”
Challenges on the Horizon
While the stars seem aligned for gun rights advocates, obstacles remain:
- Senate supermajority: Republicans lack the numbers to override a filibuster, making bipartisan support crucial.
- Opposition from anti-gun groups: Expect loud resistance from organizations that paint constitutional carry as reckless.
- Presidential Veto? With Trump as President? I don’t think so. So not an issue this time, but future legislative efforts will hinge on maintaining political control.
The Current Landscape
Currently, 29 states have adopted constitutional carry laws, allowing residents to carry firearms without a government-issued permit. These states have proven that empowering citizens to exercise their Second Amendment rights does not lead to chaos or increased crime. In fact, a recent Ohio study found that gun-related crime decreased in several cities after constitutional carry was implemented.
In contrast, gun control strongholds like Chicago, Washington D.C., and California continue to grapple with high rates of violence, undermining the argument that strict gun laws lead to safer communities. H.R. 9534 aims to bring the benefits of constitutional carry to all Americans, regardless of where they live.
Live Inventory Price Checker
|
Crossbreed Reckoning Holster for Hellcat w/ E Series, IWB/OWB, Right-Handed | Viridian Weapon Technologies | $ 79.00 |
|
|
Crossbreed Reckoning Holster for Hellcat w/ E Series, IWB/OWB, Left-Handed | Viridian Weapon Technologies | $ 79.00 |
|
|
Crossbreed MiniTuck IWB SIG 365 Holster - Black | Sportsman's Warehouse | $ 74.99 $ 53.97 |
|
|
CrossBreed Holsters MultiFlex IWB/OWB Holster by N8 Tactical for Compact Pistols | BattleHawk Armory | $ 49.99 |
|
Opposition to National Constitutional Carry: Concerns and Claims
Critics of the National Constitutional Carry Act argue that the legislation would compromise public safety and undermine states’ rights. They highlight the wide variation in state standards for concealed carry, with many states requiring safety training, live-fire experience, and stricter eligibility checks. Federalizing constitutional carry would, opponents claim, force states with rigorous standards to accept permits—or lack thereof—from states with minimal or no requirements. According to Everytown for Gun Safety, “Visitors could carry concealed firearms—even if they’ve recently been convicted of violent crimes or never received safety training.”
Public safety concerns are central to the opposition. Many states with permitless carry laws do not require safety training or proficiency testing, and some lack safeguards to prevent individuals with violent or abusive histories from carrying firearms. For example, only 23 states require safety training, and just 17 require live-fire experience. Fearful critics scream this lack of uniformity could lead to increased gun-related accidents and violence, as well as the erosion of local control over firearm regulation.
Opponents advocate for maintaining state-level autonomy and suggest national training and safety standards as an alternative. They believe that stricter eligibility criteria, such as barring individuals with histories of domestic abuse or violent crimes, would better protect public safety. For them, the National Constitutional Carry Act represents a dangerous overreach that prioritizes individual rights over the collective security of communities.
The Road Ahead
With a Republican-controlled Congress and a conservative-leaning Supreme Court, the prospects for passing national constitutional carry legislation have never been brighter. However, challenges remain. Even with GOP majorities in both chambers, achieving a supermajority in the Senate to overcome a filibuster will be difficult. Furthermore, the legislative process requires careful coordination and robust public support to counter inevitable opposition from anti-gun advocacy groups and Democratic lawmakers.
If passed, this legislation could mark a transformative moment for Second Amendment rights in the United States. It would ensure that citizens no longer have to “beg the government” for permission to exercise their constitutionally protected freedoms—a sentiment echoed by Rep. Massie and supported by prominent gun rights organizations.
Why It Matters
The National Constitutional Carry Act isn’t just about firearms; it’s about Second Amendment freedom. It’s about affirming that the government should not place undue burdens on citizens exercising their inalienable rights. A unified national standard for constitutional carry would simplify the legal landscape for gun owners, reduce the risk of accidental violations, and bolster public safety by deterring crime through responsible firearm ownership.
As the Republican majority begins its term, this legislation represents a critical opportunity to restore and protect Americans’ rights. The stakes are high, but the rewards—a safer, freer America—are worth the fight.
About Tred Law
Tred Law is your everyday patriot with a deep love for this country and a no-compromise approach to the Second Amendment. He does not write articles for Ammoland every week, but when he does write, it is usually about liberals Fing with his right to keep and bear arms.
Already legal. As of 1783 when the US Constitution was ratified which included the SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED Amendment.
Yes, but we no longer live in a constitutional republic…
That is quite untrue.
Really? And where do you see a republican form of government in action this very moment?
If you were not living in a Republic, with a constitution that safe guarded your Right to free speech, they would have disappeared you by now.
Again, what part of America, at the moment is a republic? How much sovereignty do states have? How much power does the federal government have over the people and the states? Free speech? We kinda sorta maybe got it. Alex Jones? Jan 6th protesters? School kids, you tell their teachers that boys are boys and girls are girls? How about bans on “Merry Christmas”? Any of that ring a bell? So we have, quasi free speech. A nation doesn’t have to be a republic to have a constitution. Further a nation doesn’t have to be a republic to have free… Read more »
Again, we just had an election that followed the rule of law. Transfer of power will be peaceful. Your Right to speak freely is observed. Your question about sovereignty can not be answered unless and until you describe how to measure the. how much. Gallons? Yards? Cubic feet? The residue of your questions are ungrammatical street argumentation, lacking verbs and using made up words.(e.g. kinda). But it is not your fault. You are a product of Mn public education. You can overcome that if you work hard. I would like to recommend “The Quartet” by Joseph J. Ellis. And stop… Read more »
Well you’re biggest problem here, is that you want a measurement. Well, you disagreed with me, that the America 2024, is not a republic. So, I asked you, how is the America of 2024 a republic?
Your response? Blah blah blah. You failed to answer.
PS, don’t tell me I read “stupid novels” when you don’t know what I read.
You asked, “ How much sovereignty do states have?” Before I can answer your question, you must define the measurement. Scatterbrain.
As to republic, have you sought out the knowledge of what a republic is, before asking me?
You mentioned several novels and quoted several movies before. That is how I know.
After calling me a “wretch”, don’t expect me to read your theories.
You can not improve yourself until you, first, admit the condition of your education.
“You’re” is the contraction of “you” and “are”. I believe what you were (apparently) struggling to recall was the possessive “your”. Most people err by using “your” in place of “you’re”. To err the other way, as you did…
While I appreciate your efforts, I’m sure you can guess, English class wasn’t my best subject way back when.
Because ‘We the People’ forgot how to keep it.
Indeed. Prosperity makes weak men. Hard times make strong men. We got too prosperous and lazy, to give a damn.
This 2024 election proved other wise Although not quite a clean sweep the republic won the day. Stay focused on the future the past events have proven that those wishing to destroy the will of the people have been halted for the moment. Positive interaction forward thinking will win the day leave the negative to the socialist democratic party and their own destruction .
All 2024 proved was that the dark forces, the deep state, the cabal, which ever you wish to call “them”, they knew they couldn’t rig another election, against the most popular man in America. In 2020, the rigged it, and put in a senile old man, who was never liked, even before his senility. In 2024, Trump went against a crabby, lazy communist, who slept her way to the top, and who’d never been liked, even back in her San Francisco days. Rather than risk chaos, they allowed a more or less, “fair” election. There’s a few states I’m not… Read more »
I think Mark Zuckerberg had more to do with rigging the 2020 election. The FBI and CIA rigged information prior to the election, but Zuckerburg gave grants to many swing counties to buy certain computerized voting machines in 2020.
Then the techs came in to prep the machines for the election, and after the election, the techs did “maintenance”. County officials were none the wiser.
This year Zuckerberg have out no such grants.
I could be wrong.
Factually, the date would be December 15, 1791 when the Bill of Rights was ratified. These are amendments and were not part of the Constitution when it was ratified.
I thought that the states would not ratify the new Constitution until the founders put in a bill of Rights.
My recollection of history is that the States, or at least some of them, would not ratify unless a promise was made to introduce a bill of rights. From DDG: The Constitution was ratified on June 21, 1788, when New Hampshire became the ninth of the thirteen states to approve it. The Constitution officially took effect for those nine states on that date. WP says: The ratification process for the Constitution began that day [17 Sept. 1787], and ended when the final state, Rhode Island, ratified it on May 29, 1790. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_drafting_and_ratification_of_the_United_States_Constitution It would be another year and a half… Read more »
Close, but 2A is in the Bill of Rights, which followed the 1789 ratification of the Constitution, in 1791. Not in the body of the Constitution as originally sent to the states for ratification.
“Critics of the National Constitutional Carry Act argue that the legislation would compromise public safety and undermine states’ rights.”
The states have zero rights to block or impede or impinge upon any US Constitutional right. Period. They don’t do it to any of the others.
If they want to “Codify” our “God Given/Natural Born” right, fine. The fact is the US Constitution recognizes our right to bear arms. State rights do not apply. There are no limitations on the 2nd Amendment. Look up the definition of SHALL. The 10th Amendment does not apply. State law has no standing. Municipal edicts have no standing. The only reason it is even debated is because of current and previous, weak politicians. We get what we vote for.
I want to be a fly on the wall when senator Chuck “Mr Gun Control” Schumer lives to see his whole career comes crashing down, with the passage and signing of Concealed Carry Reciprocity.
Just imagine how he reacted in his living room when he saw on tv Trump won!
He probably had a Hilary Clinton sized meltdown.
Did you hear? Constitutional carry is on the horizon. Reciprocity will not be needed, no more permit, no more fees, no more background check. That would destroy the anti-gunners.
i remember back when they were pushing the CC, the anti’s were saying it will be the wild west and the ones who bitched the most were the CCP instructors, boy did they bitch, all they cared about was it hurting there pockets, well as we have found out, no wild west, crime rates didn’t go up, oh wow the crime rates actually went down, remember open carry, they were in an up rore about that, people walking around with quick draw holsters packing 6 guns, well as we all know it nothing happened, only saw 1 person open carrying,… Read more »
Amen brother. Our right to protect ourselves has been held hostage long enough. It’s a right not a privilege.
You are quite correct.
Open Carry is traditional and Constitutional also…
HLB
we all need to pray it does
There should not be any laws against the 2A in the first place. What ever happened to, “Shall not be infringed”?
The people who sponsored, wrote, enforce or judge unconstitutional law should be jailed under the laws against treason and tyranny. When this is done we will actually have freedom.
Arm up and carry on
We the people, got too prosperous, fat and complacent. And the tyrants slowly took over. That’s what happened.
No, the rise of the autonomy and power of the bureaucracies began when FDR instituted the CFRs, written by the agencies, with the “force and effect of law” to get around Congress’s sole power to make law. FDR created this double talk so as to get around the founding fathers’ check on the central government. Don’t you remember the speech?
Another history lesson from mister know it all. Boring.
This is the correct and factual explanation. It is more difficult than “we hot fat and prosperous”, but this is the actual turning point in our history.
Turning your nose up at knowledge is why you will always sell your labor, and never your knowledge. Politicians and lawyers will continue to run circles around you and deny you your God given Rights. You will always wonder why.
You can not know where you are going, if you don’t know where you have been.
Oh yes we can! It’s called GPS!
You miss the point in your attempt to be witty, but even in the physical world, the GPS knows where you were.
Keep avoiding education, in this case political history, and you will not be able to avoid the consequences.
I concur. And his little attempt at wit does not negate the need to know our national political history, either.
The sooner the better!
It is pretty complicated. I don’t think that I have room here, but I will try. In 1933 Congress dubiously passed the Nat. Firearms Act on Congress’s authority to tax. In 1968 LBJ ushered through the Gun Control Act dubiously based on Congress’s power to control commerce. The GCA did not specifically state that Congress intended to “fill the field of gun control”. So pursuant to the preemption doctrine, the states dubiously were free to pass gun control. The preceding is all a lie because the Founders intended that the Second Amendment fill the whole field on the subject of… Read more »
No comments? This was difficult to distill into such a short space.
Nice job, WB
Thank you. It is important because the twist is how lower courts are evading the S.Ct and the Bruen methodology.
This sounds great on the surface. But, what the Fed giveth, the Fed can taketh away!! I live in MO, I doubt anti’s will be able to repeal our carry laws.
Also anti gun states be able to make shooting standards impossible? Here, when CCW was being considered. Perposels for shooting tests that pros would have trouble with.
It will be to laugh when citizens of “free states” can carry in non permissive states and the cucked citizens of those states won’t have permission.
long past defiance time.
“Is the USA on the Cusp of Passing National Constitutional Carry?” No, probably not. While this bill would be a HUGE step in the right direction, there wuld still be restrictions on carry. The ban on carrying in federal buildings is a big one that comes to mind. “29 states already allow constitutional carry.” No, they do not. There are exactly zero states with constitutional carry. The constitution enumerates your absolute right to bear arms. Currently, EVERY state still has restrictions on the bearing of arms. While the majority of states have some form of “permitless” carry, either openly and/or… Read more »
Man if this dream could come true this would end all the BS that we go through to be able to protect ourselves. I was hoping that reciprocity would finally make it but this would be the end all to finally shut the gun control groups down and then all they would have is abortion in their back pocket and would do major damage to their party. For me, measure 114 requiring me to have a permit to buy a gun would be gone, having to a carry permit in my state would be gone, having to have multiple carry… Read more »
Constitutional Carry I will say it again the constitution already guarantee’s this right to all law abiding Americans. It is those Americans have elected past and present that have abused this guarantee on the federal and state level. It seems law makers can adjust the law using a unbalanced system that they themselves have created. Yesterday the senate Chuck “Shammer ” was stopped in the conformation process of liberal rainbow judges some 200 have been confirmed since the election. Senator Thune today said that that process will now be slowed to a crawl as each new democratic appointee will have… Read more »
Every gun owner should lobby on behalf of a national safety training law that ensures that everyone – prospective concealed carriers or no – understands gun safety, the law, individual responsibility, and in particular, effective gun handling and marksmanship, as a government/private-provided support system on behalf of constitutional carry. Perhaps the most important aspect of doing so – i.e. the net result, above and beyond the government’s expressed acknowledgement of the right to bear arms in no uncertain terms – would be the vast increase in recreational shooters that would result, cementing in place an unassailable buttress of firearms freedom –… Read more »
…..The biggest problem that this national constitutional carry bill will have getting passed is that its in direct violation of “states rights”….! I don’t hear anyone talking about this at all. Federal law doesn’t trump state rights on firearm laws and its regulation in individual states. Like I said before it will be very interesting to see how President Trump pulls this off! …..
My suggestion is to keep your CCW’s current even in one of the 29 Red States who enjoy CC.
They also need to preempt the magazine bans, California gun model bans, ammo bans, and the 1000 ft gun free school zone, etc. In Phoenix there is almost nowhere that is not within 1000 ft of a school. In Mesa AZ a man was arrested for carrying in a school zone. The street was lined with businesses but owned by the University of AZ.
IMOA, carry anyway as it’s our right as stated in the BoR, 2nd Amendment. They’re going to pass a law that gives us permission and allows us Constitutional carry.
The biggest battle will be with Republicans. Many, are only nominally pro gun, some (Rick Scott, Lyndsey Graham, John Cornyn,etc, openly anti gun). So the first battle will be winning over the Republican majorities.
So since, unlike you, I’m not sitting at my computer all day, waiting for you to bark, like the rest of your pals, upsets you does it? Don’t you have a life to live? You know, chores? Errands? Ever go shooting, hunting, fishing, whatever? Given your name, I assume you’re probably retired, so, got grandkids to spend time with? A wife? A life? Or do you just sit at your computer, yapping like a little ankle biter all day long till somebody answers? I don’t take orders well, so after yesterday, you yapping at me close to 50 times over… Read more »
12 comments to me, in half an hour! You’re on a roll!
Proves you do not wish a serious conversation and have no life. You’re unhinged. Cool off before you die of high blood pressure.
It proves nothing of the sort. The best that can be said is that they are persistent.
So Old Vet deleted his dozens of comments. How cute.
I think you got your answer?
In regards to what? Old Vet deleted his dozens of comments that were gibberish.
6 comments to me in 9 minutes. You really must love me.
You are genius, my man. WELL SAID and done I be praying
Hey he’s back! I thought I wasn’t worth your time!!!
Sleep well old man? In a good mood?
Oh my, such a keen wit, and sharp tongue.
Ok yapping dog, lets see how many random comments of mine you can find and comment on! Ready? Set? GO!!!!
Why are you not at work on a work day?
Wow, you’re on a roll, I counted 17 messages from you!!!
That’s a lot of barking! Must have a sore throat! Go get a drink and take a nap.
It is a rainy day here on the ranch. I had plenty of time to respond to you AND defend you from GO’s attachks.
I am only responding to tell you that 3 hours ago you responded to a post made over a day ago that originally was to oldvet, dummy.
Your lack of comprehension is only second to your sense of self importance, which is totally misguided. Go snort another line!
Oh my, you cranky old man, calling me a drug user? Sooooooooo terrible.
You invite it. It would be rude not to accept.
Were they the typical snarky liberal comment type of comments that they use to keep you engaged? If you don’t answer fast enough it’s stuff like “nothing to say?” or “waiting for your next talking points?”?? I have a bunch of them doing this crap on various social media platforms…
Yes, but, they were from ‘Old Vet’ accusing me of being the woke libtard, the racist, the lefting, the terror sympathizer etc. It was around 50 comments over the course of the afternoon/evening. He’s since deleted most of them. Must’ve gotten sober and saw how silly he looked.
And you know what started it? There four of these guys, Old Vet, Old Man, Musicman44mag, and Wild Bill, it’s all because I don’t want America involved in another war in the Middle East. Somehow that means I’m in their words, “anti American” and a “muslime lover”.
Oh dear, you are so so aggrieved.
So now you’re going to take over for Old Vet, and send me 50 comments? LOL.
Well there’s four of you. Keep yapping little mutt.
You still refuse to see your own inadequacies. They will impede you your entire life if you do not address them.
I look forward to it.
same here
Hahahaha, Got censored did you?!!
Oh my, you’re gonna set me straight?
You’re so tough! Yap yap yap litttle mutt.
Wait, is that a Freudian slip? You “lick” those “muslimes”?
Of course not, because you edited the comment, after I pointed out the irony.
Now Old Vet since he’s too embarrassed he wrote that he “licks muslimes”, deleted his comments entirely.
Coward.
You’re getting devious, in case you ‘n your pack of yappers missed it,
Now Old Vet since he’s too embarrassed he wrote that he “licks muslimes”, deleted his comments entirely.
Coward.
You do know that the cradle of civilization is in Iraq right?
Nothing lasts forever. The west is falling. America will fall. Something else will replace it.
I grow tired of your obsessive push to keep the people of Gaza and the muslim perspective relevant on this board pushing the lefts woke agenda of “free gaza from the land to the sea” and your lie of America 1st to help convince everyone that you are an American. Ammoland is not about Israel and the muslims, it’s about guns, ammo, the threats to our 2nd amendment, political leaders, different groups combating the lefts push to disarm us and what we should and can do to combat it. I refuse to take part in your actions of argument that… Read more »
You didn’t expect me to read all that did you?
America will not “fall” today, or in my lifetime. After that it is up to you to do the hard work of keeping the Republic. Prepare yourself, now, while you have time.
I have never been involved in a vehicle/pedestrian accident.
Lol, I am thinking of the movie (oh Brother where art thou) where the wife (Mrs. Warvey) says, I’ve said my piece. That was a good movie.
Man of constant sorrow is one of my favorite blue grass tunes.
You asked me, not to talk about you behind your back, and I haven’t. Now you and the other yapping dogs are yapping about me behind my back, endlessly.
Is this a case of do as I say, but not as I do?
I feel nothing but minor amusement, at your very hypocrisy, while you so often preach the gospel. It’s amusing is all.
So don’t contact you, got it. But at the end, you ask a question…
So, what should I do?
You want me to stop contacting you, but you say there’s an “invite”? What am I being invited to and with whom?
I must’ve missed someones post.
First, like I told your friend Old Vet, I’ve never “run over everyone”… Never run over a person, a dog, cat, hit a deer… I think I did hit a squirrel once by accident though. So, the deal is be nice? Sounds nice, yeah, but you, and Old Vet, Old Man, and Wild Bill, have said various things, one, Old Man I think, says I use cocaine. One of you says I’m “retarded”. All of you say I’m “racist”. You yourself, have said countless time’s I’m a “Jew hater”. All say I’m anti American, and a terrorist sympathizer. Accuse me… Read more »
You answered nothing, acknowledged nothing. And you blame it all on me, and then tell me I should forgive? Nonsense. And you say if there’s three? No, there’s four of you, YOU, Oldvet, Oldman, Wild Bill. Saying since you “three”, even though there’s four of you, saying I’m wrong, must mean I’m wrong is, silly. This isn’t about numbers, mere numbers don’t determine, right and wrong in this case. Further you say I “only care about one side in a war, which makes you racist”, that’s silly too. It’s you four that want to destroy one side, including the non… Read more »
You’re so sanctimonious.
What you have missed is derision. You invite derision. It would be rude not to accept.
Why don’t you all stop the bullsh, it’s getting stupid and nonsense.
I don’t recognize your screen name. Have we chatted before?
There are many men of experience and learning that read what you write and make conclusions about you.
So the great Musicman44mag’s gotta go whine to his master, Old Vet?
Yup, a pack of yapping dogs, with Old Vet as the pack leader.
I can see by my tracking that you didn’t, but who the eff let the dog out? I think he scored some more cocaine. Maybe he chewed through the rope that we tied him up with? maybe he just slipped his collar? Any way, I mistakenly called him a dog. He is just a puppy in training. Who’s gonna clean up this mess?
I can’t give him a chance unless you made the deal for the rest of us too. Sorry
It’s gonna take me an hour to delete all his posts. I think it’s the coke, don’t anybody else see this?
Peace love and tolerance! LOL
You will all be so nice, as long as I toe the line… Oh so woke!
Funny.
“Nice, informative and caring”… You?!!! You’ve been the loudest, foulest mouth on Ammoland!
And now, you’re crying woke right tears, since I won’t go along with your gangs narrative and you want me to go away.
It’s ridiculous, now you playing the victim.
You write, “May God help you.”, that actually made me laugh, since you so clearly don’t mean it. Your insincerity is mind boggling.
Please read the message just posted that was on hold. It says I’m done!
Have you ever seen the cat holding onto the wooden dowl that went along with that statement? That’s me.