It’s with an eye toward determining how these 10 choices were selected for DOJ’s initial offering that prompted this FOIA request.
FOIA Request Seeks to Determine DOJ Decision-Making for Firearms Disability Relief Actions

America’s oldest Second Amendment News outlet.
He is a blogger at The War on Guns: Notes from the Resistance. https://waronguns.com/
View all of Davids work by clicking here: https://tinyurl.com/q8j9dnf
It’s with an eye toward determining how these 10 choices were selected for DOJ’s initial offering that prompted this FOIA request.
If elected governor, Spanberger threatens to enact every infringement that comes across her desk, whereas Earle-Sears will serve as a veto bulwark against Democrat excesses.
It might seem hard to outdo Hogg’s ridiculous cognitive dissonance, but one lawmaker has given him a run for his money, and an ostensible “Republican” one at that.
The only people the laws stopped were the “law-abiding,” that is, the ones being slaughtered.
Armed self-defense is “moronic.” Voting against it is “common sense.”
So, what gives with Podolsky’s very public filing, siding with notorious New York Democrat gun prohibitionists? And will AG Bondi and her new appointees now rein him in and slap him down?
While anyone dumb enough to believe in and follow his Democrat operative noisemaking can certainly be described by the old Soviet pejorative “useful idiot,” the term “Judas goat” seems more appropriate for him.
Gun rights leaders and legal scholars could be identified and nominated to analyze and prioritize bills, lawsuits, regulations, opportunities, and threats, to advise on judicial and other federal nominees, and to help educate the public.
It’s clear the agenda here is hyperbole, not precision. And for that, consider Titus’ “bipartisan” partner in citizen disarmament, Giffords-endorsed Pennsylvania “Republican” Brian Fitzpatrick.
So, the answer from the gun-grabbers, naturally, is more “gun control” over you and me.
A new request for DOJ investigation has been filed detailing Second Amendment and civil rights violations inherent in the state’s Firearms Owner Identification card (FOID) requirement.
It’s not hyperbole to conclude this drunk’s “passion” includes denying her countrymen God-given rights enshrined in a document she swore an oath to uphold.
Meanwhile, Democrat influencers with wide media reach and plenty of experience ginning up the mob, are turning up the heat.
While the country as a whole may not be ready for an AOC White House bid, a potential coalition builder like Wes Moore is another matter altogether.
Yet despite clear evidence of bias, thanks to a U.S. Department of Justice official policy of deliberate indifference, such judges will remain on the bench.
If it were other civil rights being violated by a state, precedent has already been established that the U.S. Department of Justice would step in and put a stop to it.
If you want to fight for your rights against the unlimited power and treasure of the state, you’re on your own. That’s “the reasonableness of the government’s position.”
What this means is the Form 4473 will need to be revised again if ATF is to comply with the executive order.
“When seconds count, police are minutes away” takes over, and the only rational and effective “Action Plan” is “Stop the Threat.”
Throw more money into that? What’s the definition of insanity, again?
It sounds more like reserve “Only Ones,” and Founding era thought leaders weren’t big on “select militias.”
Paul Valone has written a very important primer that helps all of us recognize where we can best fit our talents and goals to beat the control freaks and prohibitionists at their own game…
If only the Founders had conceived of a way that Americans could band together in times of existential threat and to provide for what was “necessary to the security of a free state…”
Top officials, in all branches of government, the police, and the military, are in the pockets of the cartels.
Why are they so desperately angry, ready to drop all pretenses of “friends across the aisle” civility and call for street violence? Against people they’re trying to disarm…?
“This will be a congressional fight, a constitutional fight, a legal fight, and on days like this a street fight…”
Not all of us have the high capacity for swallowing disinformation and utter hogwash we find in the average Giffords supporter.
Trump’s Second Amendment order is a good first step. It’s up to us to keep him on the path and walking in the right direction.
Protecting the right to keep and bear arms requires voting against those who would infringe on it at the ballot box.
Left unsaid is how they intend to disarm those of us they want hanged by the neck until dead.