About Greg Camp

If we are asked to accept what he said on one case because he said it, it’s fair to ask whether we ought to accept something else he said for the same reason.

Hogg implies that he values his privacy and is upset that he’s being punished for the bad action of someone else.

Nobodies are by no means silent, and when enough of them work each other into a lather, the bog gets noisy, and laws get passed.

We can work together on things that do reduce violence—education, poverty reduction, and anti-bullying programs—but we can’t cooperate as long as demands to violate our rights are still on the table.

Compromise is a necessary evil of a democratic system, but only if we understand that some things are matters of principle. Rights are one of those.

The real question here is whether we will seek solutions that work or will continue repeating the failures of the past.

People intent on doing harm—and people whose minds work differently from the norm—will find ways around the measures that we impose on the rest of us.

Arbitrary limits on what everyone may own make no sense. Having the right tool for the job is what freedom allows us.

Let’s start this off with a fact about American politics: There are no laurels, and we who support gun rights do not get to rest.

Pavlovitz has no intention of civil discourse. His goal is to smother rights with compulsory love, and it’s up to the good people of this country to stand against him for freedom.