Talking points have been passed out and it’s now their “job” to parrot the narrative…
Media Jumping on New Pediatric Study to Stump for More Gun Control

America’s oldest Second Amendment News outlet.
Talking points have been passed out and it’s now their “job” to parrot the narrative…
Opinion Some of us remember our days as kids, when the adults in our lives would tell us before bedtime, “Brush your teeth, and say your prayers.” It wasn’t a threat, however, but an injunction to end the day on a healthy and uplifting note. Now, however, “science” is informing us that this old-fashioned directive […]
As always, the goal is to promote gun control laws and to create a public demand for them.
We’re supposed be influenced by a statistically insignificant sample of losers and apply that judgment to young people, such as those involved in NRA Youth Interests programs…
The organizations pushing the study as ‘valid statistics’ wanted to use it as anti-gun propaganda, instead the study exposed the dangers of gun free zones.
Throw more money into that? What’s the definition of insanity, again?
It took just minutes to create graphs to see how anti-gun groups like the Brady Center, the March for Our Lives Foundation, the Sandy Hook Promise Foundation, Everytown for Gun Safety and Giffords were funded.
Rather than heeding reality, expect the junk science purveyors and their elitist-funded “independent” propagandists to continue whining and to resume their politically motivated perversions of medical science.
The 2021 National Firearms Survey has gun control advocates nervous. It exposes the depth of American gun culture & directly counters narratives used to justify gun control policies…
These infringements, as they always do, will only burden “law-abiding” people. Criminals will still get all the guns they want the old-fashioned way as they keep sending doctors more patients.
A recent study by a Massachusetts-based think tank delving into the differences between what Americans say publicly and what they think privately has revealed that most people support private gun ownership.
A paper published by the Journal of the American Medical Society has significant flaws in its basic assumptions about reality. A definition of what is meant by a “shooting” is missing.
Billionaires Laura and John Arnold are quietly bankrolling research that promotes and supports their radical anti-gun views.
The CDC’s findings were that guns are an effective & often used crime deterrent and that most firearm incidents are not fatal…
Why might people be skeptical about “public health?” Second Amendment supporters know all too well…
The CDC’s new foray into gun violence “research” could be an existential threat to Second Amendment advocacy.
Could Second Amendment activism be declared “misinformation” on a matter of public health by the Biden-Harris regime?
Researchers found if a mass casualty event doesn’t fit a preconceived political narrative and policy prescription the media does not consider it worth covering.
We’d like to thank the anti-gun Joyce Foundation and, perhaps unwittingly, California taxpayers for making this study possible.
In an amusing story, a government-funded media outlet notorious for its liberal slant found that the overwhelming majority of school shootings listed in a federal report never occurred.
They misleadingly describe these as “gun safety laws”, but they are actually all restrictions on Americans’ Constitutionally enshrined right to keep and bear arms.
I can testify that the AMA has been moving steadily to the left in a variety of issues, from the perversion of medical ethics to gun control…
The Violence Policy Center has been lauding a 2002 study as “the most comprehensive study ever conducted on impact of gun availability.” But let examine the real facts….
There is a worrying trend in academic medicine which equates statistics with science, and sophistication in quantitative procedure with research excellence.
We take some satisfaction in revealing when “research” turns out to be made of recycled memes, illogical methods and forgone conclusions.
The gun law “study” by Boston medical researchers published in the Lancet, is a good example of pure junk science. It is highly political.
What is remarkable is the USA has the highest rate of civilian gun ownership in the world. Yet the United States is among the safest places to live in the world…
Anti gun researchers at The New England Journal of Medicine don’t like “research parasites” using their data to try to disprove what the original investigators claim to have proved..!?!
Give me a break. In just the last 10 years alone, the Chicago-based Joyce Foundation has donated about $40 million to anti-gun organizations…
Bloomberg and others are funding so many new gun control studies that it is becoming harder to keep up with the multiple studies that are coming out each week…