To paraphrase the hit song title from the last century, what a difference a judge and a president make.
Judge Declares Bump Stock Ban Unlawful, Orders ATF to Pay Attorney Fees

America’s oldest Second Amendment News outlet.
To paraphrase the hit song title from the last century, what a difference a judge and a president make.
When Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey signed an emergency enactment of the state’s new gun control law, she was trying to head off a petition drive…
Was the bump stock ban by President Trump’s executive action shrewd strategy or fortuitous improvisation. The historical evidence is considered.
The outcome of Garland v. Cargill could have a broad impact on the administrative state’s ability to legislate that goes well beyond bump stocks.
Can we really expect any politician to be more firmly grounded in Second Amendment history and principles than the head of the most powerful gun rights organization in the world?
In a landmark case, every Judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, struck down the ATF rule which changed the definition of a machinegun to include bump stocks.
Thus, Congress, not ATF or the courts, must decide if bump stocks—or any other firearm—should be criminally outlawed, and Congress has not done that with bump stocks.
The Supreme Court’s decision means bump stocks will remain illegal, & it might be some time before the court hears a case that will reign in the rogue ATF agency.
The object here is not to attack him or to start a feud with Dad; it’s to see if the guy who says he wants to lead us knows where he’s going and why.
Gun Owners Of America’s petition argues that the ATF circumvented Congress in its attempt to create arbitrarily new federal law.
It’s just another example of the ongoing federal con job to infringe on our rights, keep gun owners under their boot, and amass self-serving power…
Naturally, those causing the lion’s share of the violence will continue unimpeded.
Obama & Joe Biden believed that Hillary Clinton was going to win & with newscasts showing semi-automatics rapidly firing with bump stocks, a sweeping semi-automatic ban could be implemented.
The Supreme Court recently denied certiorari in the case of GUEDES v. BATFE. Justice Gorsuch wrote a response explaining his concerns about the case.
Gun grabbers are not happy with Gun Owners of America in Cincinnati, Ohio, where GOA was continuing its legal challenge of the ATF bump stock ban.
It is really a simple request and the way they are going about fighting it and ignoring it is simply bizarre.
“I seek to obtain the names and addresses where checks will be mailed for the bump stock buy back program. My intent is to create a searchable database and map of Washington state.”—”Yati Arguna”
RW Arms is sueing the BATFE for losses of their bump stock inventory under the Fifth Amendment Takings Clause.
Not surprisingly, Graham refused to announce his witness list until 24 hours before the hearing. And he refused to allow other Republican senators to have any input.
What this means is, for now, the named plaintiffs, including this correspondent, will not be subject to enforcement action after the ban goes in effect Tuesday.
The Las Vegas shooting was the first case where a bump stock was used in a crime and this ONE case would hardly then represent an imminent “danger to public safety.”
The Bump Stock case has been expedited by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.
Judge Dabney L. Friedrich, nominated to the court by President Donald Trump, ruled against all motions for a preliminary injunction to find for the administration…
This pointless legislation is just one more attack on gun owners and accomplishes nothing but create another avenue for the state to get into your pocket.
The siege began on many of us when the clock started ticking on the “Trumpstock ban.”
The new ATF Rule makes clear that the public must become aware of the intricacies of Governmental action lest the American people lose their sacred fundamental rights and liberties.
Apart from Trump’s rash, incorrigible action, what, if anything, has Congress done to curb possession of “bump stocks devices?”
President Donald J. Trump, under immense pressure from the vocal anti-gun community, following the mass shooting in Las Vegas, Nevada, charged the Department of Justice, and subsequently the ATF…
If the Courts do not strike down Trump’s action, we will continue to see the inexorable whittling away of the right of the people to keep and bear arms, leading inevitably to the demise of civilian ow
Donald Trump May Act Rashly on Some Matters and Avoid Repercussions; Not So, When He Blatantly Attacks the Second Amendment.