California lawmakers just voted to ban the sale of Glock pistols — the most popular handgun in America. AB 1127 proves once again that Sacramento isn’t after “safety,” they’re after control, and what starts in California won’t stop there.
The 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals struck down key parts of NJ’s carry law, ruling that bans on guns in private vehicles, the default ban on private property, a liability insurance mandate, and a $50 fee all likely violate the Second Amendment. Gun-rights groups called the ruling a major victory…
…federal appeals courts have ruled that categorical statutory bans on gun ownership, whether based on illegal drug use or criminal convictions, may be unconstitutional as applied to specific individuals.
The Second Amendment Foundation has filed a motion for summary judgment in its lawsuit challenging Illinois law that bans firearms in homes licensed to provide foster or day care.
The Gun-Free School Zones Act is federal overreach at its worst—stretching the Commerce Clause beyond recognition and gutting the Second Amendment. By turning law-abiding citizens into felons for
“For too long, states like CA & NY have attempted to end-run the rights of law-abiding Americans by requiring them to select from a limited, pre-approved list of handguns…
At issue are federal laws that ban licensed firearm dealers from selling handguns to buyers who live in another state.
It’s possible gun control activist legislators in Rhode Island – including Gov. Dan McKee – haven’t seen or read recent opinions from the U.S. Supreme Court specifically mentioning or pertaining to Modern Sporting Rifles (MSRs), like the AR-15…
I would not wait to decide whether the government can ban the most popular rifle in America. That question is of critical importance to tens of millions of law-abiding AR–15 owners throughout the country. We have avoided deciding it for a full decade …
This bill makes instant criminals out of Oregonians who lawfully obtained & lawfully used certain gun parts. There is no grandfathering, no legal way to transfer them. Democrats want to entrap as many gun owners as possible.
The U.S. Supreme Court finally answered the question of whether it will address the issue of states banning entire classes of firearms… Unfortunately, the answer – for now at least – is “not yet.”
The new law bans sales of common semiautomatic rifles and shotguns equipped with detachable magazines and gas-operated handguns that accept detachable magazines.
Behind California politician’s surface talk of cracking down on “machinegun conversion devices” is a targeted attack on some of the most popular and widely owned pistols in the country
The Colorado State Legislature is drowning in a flood of radical anti-gun bills, and gun owners across the state are fighting to keep their rights above water.
New York’s ban on carry in parks is unconstitutional and it’s not a close call. The Second Circuit should put a stop to this restriction that the State enacted in defiance of the Supreme Court’s clear decision in Bruen
Ultimately, the text of the Second Amendment includes eighteen-to-twenty-year-old individuals among ‘the people’ whose right to keep and bear arms is protected.
The newest fear myth being propagated by anti-gun groups is that “non-powder guns” pose a significant threat to public!? Wait what?
One thing is clear: the fight over “assault weapons” is far from over. With states pushing back against federal guidelines and the Supreme Court setting new precedents, gun owners need to stay informed and engaged.
Unless Trump successfully challenges his 34 felony convictions on appeal, he will suffer a lifelong 2A penalty that should trouble civil libertarians across the political spectrum.
Friends who live in Canada tell me, nearly every autoloading rifle, particularly those with military origins, are “prohibited weapons” and may not be possessed by Canadian citizens.
Affected firearm owners have no intention or incentive to surrender their guns to a political regime that will almost certainly be out of office before the confiscation deadline of 30 October 2025…
The case of Paris v. Lara, revolves around the rights of 18-to-20-year-old adults to carry firearms for self-defense under the Second Amendment.
Despite the emotional and tearful narratives presented by gun banners, including testimonies from gun violence victims, the court ruled that the preemption laws were within constitutional bounds.
The court denounced “those who seek to usher in a sort of post-Constitution era where the citizens’ individual rights are only as important as they are convenient to a ruling class..”
Concerning was Trump appointee Judge Amy St. Eve’s line of questioning, which suggested she might not fully grasp the basics of the second amendment case.
In Canada, PM Justin Trudeau’s gun ban is in trouble as the government finds resistance to the leftist plans.
If courts can uphold modern gun control laws without direct historical analogs, it could pave the way for more restrictive regulations that infringe upon Second Amendment rights.
The five-member Okeechobee, Florida city council and Police Chief Donald Hagan may each be forced to pay $5,000 personally – without using taxpayer dollars – for violating Florida’s powerful preemption statute.
Illinois law banning concealed carry on public transportation ruled unconstitutional. Learn about the ongoing legal battle and its implications.
The City of Okeechobee took advantage of the storm by prohibiting carrying, selling, or displaying firearms and ammunition during its state of emergency.