The Fourth Circuit reversed that decision, using a “balancing test” to come to conclude that Maryland may override the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms in the name of public safety…
GOA Backing Case Before the Supreme Court

America’s oldest Second Amendment News outlet.
The Fourth Circuit reversed that decision, using a “balancing test” to come to conclude that Maryland may override the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms in the name of public safety…
The ultimate question in this case is why should an individual be required to demonstrate a “need” in order to exercise a fundamental, constitutional, right, here in New Jersey???
Although Concealed Carry Laws are on the books in New Jersey, judges and police chiefs have almost unanimously declined concealed carry permits to everyone but, other police, judges, politicians…
As we indicated in previously the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals overturned the District Court finding that the State’s requirement for a “good and substantial” cause was unconstitutional…
Despite numerous studies including those cited in the gunfacts.info publication, the 4th Circuit believed the word of appointed police chiefs over independent and unbiased researchers…
The Federal 4th Circuit Court has overturned the Federal District Court of Maryland decision and has upheld the “good and substantial” language in Maryland gun law…
SAF and the five individual plaintiffs are challenging whether the state can arbitrarily restrict the Second Amendment right to bear arms outside the home by requiring people to prove a special need to the satisfaction of a government official…
Oral arguments were presented before the Federal 4th Circuit Court in Richmond on Wednesday, October 24, 2012…
As many of you already know, the Woollard case proceeded to oral arguments on October 24th at the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, VA…
Orange County citizens should be able to exercise their fundamental right to bear arms, but are precluded from doing so because they do not have what Sheriff Hutchens uniquely considers “good cause.”
That fight will determine whether the Founders -– or the liberal nut cases who govern the People’s Republic of Maryland -– will dictate the scope of the Second Amendment.
On July 23rd, the district court ruled that the State was not entitled to a further stay and that it had two weeks to begin processing permits without the unconstitutional requirement.
SAF is delighted that the judge in a Maryland case that challenges the constitutionality of that state’s handgun permitting scheme is ready to lift a stay on his original order to process permits.
US District Court for the District of MD has issued an order to dissolve the temporary stay of the ruling that declared the “good and substantial” clause of MD’s carry permit law unconstitutional.
A study by the Harvard Injury Control Research Center was included in support of the State’s position. Note that the Research Center Bulletins are funded by the notoriously anti-gun Joyce Foundation.
This new clarification includes an actual permanent injunction they cannot ignore. Let there be no doubt: Good and Substantial is dead in Maryland.
The right to armed defense is one of the few enumerated, fundamental rights that we possess, and the state may not simply wish it away.
New Jersey’s political elite were oblivious to the ruling and its future impact on New Jersey residents’ Right to Keep and Bear Arms.
Judge Legg’s ruling takes a substantial step toward restoring the Second Amendment to its rightful place in the Bill of Rights and provides gun owners with another significant victory.
The law impermissible infringes on the right to keep and bear arms, guaranteed by the Second Amendment.
United States District Court for the District of Maryland has granted a motion for summary judgment for plaintiff Ray Woollard in the Woollard v. Sheridan case.