Trump’s DOJ has made it clear: going forward, they will focus on truly dangerous criminals—not law-abiding citizens caught in the web of arbitrary gun laws.
DOJ Shifts Focus to Dangerous Criminals, Away From Gun Owners: A Win for 2A ~ VIDEO
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ccf07/ccf07e6bcfe5f3749a4060fe07d02ed0c63e43b1" alt="Handcuffs"
America’s oldest Second Amendment News outlet.
Trump’s DOJ has made it clear: going forward, they will focus on truly dangerous criminals—not law-abiding citizens caught in the web of arbitrary gun laws.
The ruling is a triumph for gun rights advocates who argue that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to possess a broad range of arms [Tanks, Bombs, Jets],,,,
Governments can now temporarily adjust laws to avoid unfavorable legal precedents, only to potentially reinstate them later. This undermines the judicial process and jeopardizes the protection of fundamental rights..
The Supreme Court has announced that it will conference three major gun rights cases on January 10th, 2025. This could be a turning point for constitutional freedoms as we know them.
The right to keep and bear arms is fundamental and not subject to arbitrary restrictions. Any ambiguity in historical context should default to the clear text of the Second Amendment…
Courts are making core mistakes that could seriously impact the future of lawful firearm ownership. Here’s a breakdown of some of the key points…
In the post-Bruen legal landscape, courts have been grappling & failing with how to interpret the 2nd Amendment under new guidelines set by the Supreme Court.
Concerning was Trump appointee Judge Amy St. Eve’s line of questioning, which suggested she might not fully grasp the basics of the second amendment case.
In a significant development, the United States Supreme Court has ordered Delaware to respond immediately to the petition in a pending 2nd Amendment Case…
Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s focus on one term is not just a legal technicality – it’s a deliberate choice that connects directly to the constitutional protection of firearms.
Human Rights activist are pushing back against what they see as unconstitutional restrictions. On the other side, the state argues that these bans are necessary for “public safety.”
Suppressors are neither “dangerous” nor “unusual,” a standard set by the Court for determining whether an item can be banned. There are over three million legally registered suppressors in the United States…
Judge Watson’s decision struck down both arguments, claiming that neither the short-barreled rifle nor the machine gun falls within the scope of the Second Amendment’s protection
In a groundbreaking decision, the U.S. District Court in Kansas ruled that machine guns and your GOD-given right to have one are protected under the Second Amendment.
The Harris/Biden ATF’s are arguing in court that that if something, anything, could potentially be modified into a machine gun, it should be regulated as one. This is a slippery slope.
Kyle Rittenhouse sparked a significant controversy in the gun rights community when he initially announced his intention to write in Ron Paul for President instead of Donald Trump.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit is likely to reaffirm that non-violent felons like Brian Range cannot be stripped of their gun rights for life.
For gun rights advocates, the Rahimi decision is a victory that reinforces the constitutional protections of the 2nd Amendment while recognizing narrowly tailored restrictions on dangerous individuals.
Recently, the Supreme Court made a significant move by refusing to hear any new Second Amendment cases, leaving many gun rights advocates wondering about the implications.
The anti-gun movement failed to accomplish its goal of destroying the “text first, history second” approach to deciding Second Amendment-related cases.
Constitutional attorney and Second Amendment advocate Mark W. Smith provided an insightful analysis of the ongoing legal battles over gun rights in the United States.
For gun rights supporters, today’s news is a mixed bag. While the denial in the Bianchi case is disappointing, it doesn’t close the door on future Supreme Court intervention…
If the First Amendment can be circumvented under the guise of protecting public interest, what stops the government from doing the same with the Second Amendment?
Judge Benitez will have the opportunity to delve deeper into issues he’s passionate about, and that’s something we can all get behind.
While the case directly concerns presidential immunity, its outcomes could ripple through various facets of American law, including the Second Amendment.
An actual Judge of Cowlitz County, Washington, ruled the state’s ban on magazines holding over 10 rounds unconstitutional. Almost immediately a WA Court CLERK stayed Judge Basher’s decision…
Comparing the structure of the Second Amendment to other constitutional rights reveals a consistent theme: the protection of individual freedoms.
In an oh-so-satisfying victory for Second Amendment supporters in Hawaii, Blake Day has successfully navigated through the challenging waters of Hawaii’s restrictive gun permit policies, securing his fundamental right to carry a concealed firearm
The Fourth Circuit will likely rule against the Second Amendment advocates, either by upholding Maryland’s ban directly or remanding the case for further litigation….
Maryland’s “assault weapons” ban, which seeks to outlaw the AR-15, among other semiautomatic firearms.