America’s oldest Second Amendment News outlet.
RSS feed
Do these groups truly care about public safety, or is their agenda primarily about disarming law-abiding citizens? Spoiler alert: they hate your guns more than the safety of your family….
One would think the daughter of Hmong refugees taken into this country would take the time to appreciate why freedoms recognized here make it different from the tyranny her family fled.
“Uvalde shooting survivors’ families sue UPS, FedEx for shipping weapon used by gunman in school massacre,” The Texas Tribune reported Monday.
…we are working around the clock in all 50 states to safeguard the Second Amendment so mothers, daughters, sisters, and others can defend themselves and their loved ones from harm.”
Andrea and Moms Demand are determined to make sure the law keeps your victims defenseless.
It’s not as easy for gun-banners to find someone who is willing to listen to their inane pleas. They’re desperate for an audience – any audience.
The instant the first Russian T-80 crossed the Ukrainian border, the whole world could see the uselessness of everything you’ve ever said and everything you’ve ever done.
Times are tough for Bloomberg’s well-paid anti-gun “moms”. They rant & rave about the evils of gun ownership but in America, no one is listening.
To be clear, he, and they, support Chinese communist citizen disarmament edicts and want to impose them here.
So, they’re admitting an armed citizenry is “necessary to the security of a free State”?
Former federal prosecutor Charles Stimson told Fox News Digital that the nation’s crime problem lays at the feet of “soft-on-crime district attorneys,” not guns.
No citizen should be required to justify his or her exercise of an enumerated right, which is really what the New York case is all about.
That’s interesting, considering Warren is a member of Michael Bloomberg’s Mayors Against Illegal Guns.
Watts’ tweet introduces another chilling motivation, “replacement theory.”
“Today the House Committee on Health Care heard HB2510, a bill to hold gun owners liable for the violent crimes of thieves,” OFF alerted members Thursday.
COVID-19 may have slowed down the world, but it has not stalled those who want to strip us from our GOD-given freedoms!
Note that none of them teach actual gun safety, they just deliberately conflate the word with what they really mean: Prohibition.
Everytown and Moms Demand gladly support and take funds from the one guy who was bold enough to attempt to publicly, buy the black vote for Joe Biden in Florida.
New Jersey: A representative of a lobby group supporting anti-civil rights orgs, getting his information several hours before any official announcements to the public? Here is the proof.
None of these statements have anything to do with responsible gun ownership, they have to do with restricting civil rights and outlawing firearms.
The Michael Bloomberg financed astroturf group, Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense, was exposed in an email calling on NJ Governor Phil Murphy to close gun shops as non-essential. Just days later…
By the anti-gun group’s own admission, that the problems we are facing mirror what law-abiding gun owners have been saying all along, the problem is not the gun, but the individual.
Moms Demand Action has come out against police. It is impossible to have police, without police violence. A new Orwellian term has been created: “police violence”.
What’s clear from their own rhetoric is that the ones applying the double standard are those who demand a monopoly of violence. It’s not what the anti-gunners say, but what they don’t say.
[S]he “Directed [a] seven-member team that identified and managed issues and crises for clients, including Monsanto Company [and] Bayer Corporation.”
Self-defense, the manipulators originating such memes would have us believe, is an act of privileged racism.
Because he, with other privileged celebrities, came out in full support of the Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence/Bloomberg Mayors Against Illegal Guns agenda to “Demand a Plan.”
Their [paid] numbers continue to grow and if there is one thing we have learned, their emotional pleas are sometimes bought by Republican lawmakers who don’t know any better.
In anti-gun politics, when a group funded by moneyed special interests tries to pass itself off as “grassroots,” it’s called “Astroturf.”
Anybody see anything in there about information being turned over to a third party for political campaign purposes?
