Does the DOJ have the power to create new classes of “prohibited persons” outside of what is statutorily defined?
DOJ Reconsiders Denial of Documents in Hunter Biden-Related NICS Permanent Entry Consent Suit

America’s oldest Second Amendment News outlet.
Does the DOJ have the power to create new classes of “prohibited persons” outside of what is statutorily defined?
In the court’s opinion, the Second Amendment guarantees citizens the right to defend themselves, not only with firearms but also with less-than-lethal weapons.
An “agreement to formalize the process was signed by ATF and FBI in October 2023 and goes into effect January 2024.”
“bump stocks” were “legal” at the time & could not have been the “illegally possessed prohibited firearms” mentioned in the FBI report. So what weapon/s are they referring to?
“Basically, the government announces to the court what it is to believe and then demands the court march in lock-step along with it.
Lies of omission can be even more insidiously destructive than the in-your-face kind.
…what ATF describes as “fun” can be highly dangerous, and result in false reporting for revenge, and “swatting.”
Consequently, Judgment shall enter in favor of Plaintiffs. Defendants are PERMANENTLY ENJOINED from enforcing § 11-47-42(a) as related to stun guns.
The Biden administration’s actions are especially curious, having made “gun control” and outrage over racial injustices domestic policy centerpieces.
Just look at the legal resources that have been invested in this to keep from answering a simple question of demonstrable public interest.
[T]he magazine, unsurprisingly to anyone familiar with its anti-gun bent, attempted to bolster a claim that “these rifles were meant for the military, not civilians.”
Two Second Amendment-related actions filed Monday seeking to protect rights in Hawaii are being deliberately delayed. ‘justice too long delayed is justice denied”.
The official Biden Administration law enforcement position is that the Hunter Biden gun story is none of our business.
The official Biden DOJ position is this is none of our business.
So a positive GOA ruling would definitely revitalize our efforts.
Multiple reports claim Biden’s handgun was thrown into a supermarket trash receptacle by his widowed sister-in-law and then-lover. That response opens the door to…
Under these circumstances, the request should have been denied categorically without a search due to the substantial privacy interests retained by the subject of Mr. Codrea’s request.
The Roberts court has disappointed in the past. Questions about the Chief Justice have eroded confidence in the courts being a venue where recourse for gun owners is possible.
The agency is charged with improperly withholding records it is required by Freedom of Information Act laws to produce regarding its role in the case of a gun belonging to Hunter Biden.
Leave it to arrogant statists on the bench not to recognize the basics of the Constitution they swore an oath to uphold.
Considering the Biden administration is all about “gun control,” the hypocrisy of deliberately violating the law must not be ignored. Nor should any official cover-ups.
By not allowing the truth to be known, and by ensuring that those responsible will not be held accountable, the incentive never to do it again has been reduced.
Anyone who tells you “this is just about a stupid piece of plastic” doesn’t understand the issue.
The issue here is that by purchasing his gun from a dealer, Biden would have had to answer “No” on the ATF Form 4473 question about being an unlawful user of a controlled substance.
That’s because my attorney, Stephen Stamboulieh, filed a Freedom of Information Act request on my behalf asking for documents that could reveal who authorized the determination…
That means Mr. Nickel’s right to apply for and purchase a firearm is now recognized and the state and county/city may no longer refuse him.
After being put on hold pending action on an unrelated case by the Supreme Court, the case of Young v. Hawaii is once more moving forward.
Expecting the nation’s top law enforcement agency to comply with the nation’s laws hardly seems out of line…
So they’ll go after violations for other rights, but where the Second Amendment is concerned, state entities can do as they please without fear of federal checks?
“Because of inaction, this Court has allowed the lower courts all the latitude they need to render the Second Amendment a paper tiger,” the brief charges…